برآورد نیاز آبی فضای سبز در منظر شهری جزیرۀ کیش

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه مخاطرات محیطی، پژوهشکده علوم دریایی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران

2 گروه مهندسی سوانح، آموزش و سیستم های محیط زیست- دانشکده محیط زیست- دانشگاه تهران

3 گروه برنامه‌ریزی، مدیریت و آموزش محیط‌زیست، دانشکده محیط-زیست، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.

‎10.22052/deej.2025.254229.1041

چکیده

محاسبة نیاز آبی فضای سبز شهری، یکی از راهبردهای اصلی در مدیریت منابع آب است که در این پژوهش نیاز آبی فضاهای سبز شهری در جزیرۀ کیش مورد مطالعه قرار گرفت. ابتدا با تصویر ماهوارۀ Sentinel-2 و مشاهدات میدانی، مساحت پهنه‌های سبز محاسبه شده و به هفت طبقه شامل مکان‌های صنعتی، رفوژ خیابان‌ها، فضای سبز در مراکز اداری، میدان‌های شهری، پارک‌ها، مراکز تجاری- گردشگری و محله‌های مسکونی دسته‌بندی شد. سپس با دستورالعمل پیشنهادی دانشگاه کالیفرنیا (wucols)، نیاز آبی در مقیاس ماهانه و سالانه محاسبه شد. نتایج نشان داد6/756 هکتار فضای سبز شهری در کیش وجود دارد، که پارک‌ها و رفوژ خیابان‌ها به‌ترتیب با 6/228 و 9/214 هکتار، بیشترین مساحت سبز را دارند؛ اما میدان‌های شهری و محله‌ها به‌ترتیب با 3/50 و 2/59 هکتار کمترین مساحت سبز را دارند. براساس روش wucols، نیاز آبی سالانۀ فضای سبز پارک‌ها، رفوژها، مراکز تجاری، اداری، محله‌ها، میدان‌ها و شهرک‌های صنعتی به‌ترتیب 93/1، 04/1، 89/0، 60/0، 39/0، 23/0 و 04/0 میلیون متر مکعب به‌ دست آمد. در مقیاس ماهانه اردیبهشت، خرداد و تیر با 59/0، 58/0 و 58/0 میلیون متر مکعب بیشترین نیاز آبی و دی، آذر و بهمن‌ به‌ترتیب با 22/0، 24/0 و 28/0 میلیون متر مکعب کمترین نیاز آبی را دارند. نیاز آبی کل فضای سبز شهری کیش، 10/5 میلیون متر مکعب برآورد گردید. با توجه به اینکه در کیش سالانه حدود 39/5 میلیون متر مکعب آب برای آبیاری فضای سبز مصرف می‌شود، می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که خطای مدل محاسباتی روش wucols، کمتر از 5 درصد است و می‌تواند در دیگر شهرها نیز مورد استفاده قرار بگیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Estimation of Water Requirements for Urban Green Infrastructures in Kish Island

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahmoud Behrouzi 1
  • Ahmad Nohegar 2
  • Panisa Hassanzadeh 3
1 Department of Environmental Hazards - Marine Science Research Institute, University of Tehran, Tehran
2 Department of Accident Engineering, Education and Environmental Systems - Faculty of Environment - University of Tehran
3 Master student, Environment- Education, Faculty of Environment, University of Tehran, Tehran. Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Since 1993 (1372 SH), Kish Island has experienced significant population growth and urban expansion, particularly in its coastal areas. This development led to the creation of extensive green infrastructure, including wide streets, neighborhood parks, and numerous gardens, primarily featuring diverse plant species. However, climate change presents substantial challenges for these urban landscapes. Rising temperatures and limited water resources intensify the need for a strategic approach to urban greenery, focusing on increasing and diversifying tree and ornamental plant species adapted to harsh urban conditions.
Currently, there is a paucity of information regarding the irrigation requirements of urban green spaces on Kish Island. A practical, standardized method for measuring these water needs is also lacking. This deficit in understanding creates significant challenges for both plant health and urban landscape managers, leading to inefficiencies and disruptions in water resource management. Therefore, this research aims to calculate the monthly and annual water requirements of Kish Island's urban green spaces using the WUCOLS (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) method developed by the University of California.
 
Method and Materials: To determine the monthly and annual water requirements of urban green spaces on Kish Island, we first conducted field observations and utilized existing land-use maps, an AutoCAD map of Kish Island, and calculated the total area of urban green spaces. Based on these analyses, we categorized the urban green spaces into seven distinct types:

Green spaces alongside streets, industrial estates, and the sewage treatment plant
Traffic islands (Refuges)
Green spaces within administrative and educational centers
Green spaces in urban squares
Urban-coastal parks and gardens
Green spaces in commercial, tourism, and sports centers, including the Olympic complex
Green blocks and green spaces within neighborhoods and residential complexes

Following this classification, we calculated the water requirement for the mixed greenery of Kish Island using the guidelines proposed by the Water Use Classification of Landscape Species (WUCOLS) method from the University of California.
 
Results: The study found that the total annual water requirement for Kish Island's 756.6 hectares of urban green space is approximately 12.5 million cubic meters. Urban parks and gardens, along with street traffic islands (refuges), emerged as the areas with the highest water demand, each requiring over one million cubic meters annually.
Monthly analysis revealed that May, June, and July exhibit the highest water requirements, while December and January show the lowest, a trend that directly mirrors the island's evaporation rates. Generally, water demand begins to increase in February, coinciding with rising temperatures and evapotranspiration, and continues to climb until August. It then gradually decreases from September to January before the cycle restarts. This pattern represents the typical annual water demand cycle for Kish Island's green spaces.
Overall, the calculated annual water requirement for the entire green space of Kish Island stands at about 2.5 million cubic meters per year, with an estimated error of 5%.
 
Discussion and Conclusion: Urban landscape vegetation is a vital component of the urban environment, offering numerous environmental, social, and economic benefits. Environmentally, it fosters biodiversity, provides crucial habitat and food sources for urban wildlife, prevents soil erosion, and improves drainage. Green spaces also act as air purifiers and temperature regulators, effectively mitigating the urban heat island effect and reducing noise pollution. Socially, urban vegetation enhances recreational opportunities, strengthens residents' connection to nature, and significantly contributes to creating sustainable and livable cities. Economically, benefits include increased property values and, with proper design, a reduction in urban flash floods. Achieving these benefits necessitates a strong focus on sustainable water management for urban landscapes, especially in water-scarce regions where irrigation demands for urban vegetation compete with other essential water needs. A review of existing literature highlights a limited understanding of irrigation requirements for urban green spaces, posing a significant challenge to the broader adoption of green infrastructure like green walls, green roofs, rain gardens, and bio retention systems. The present study demonstrates that the WUCOLS method is a practical approach for providing an initial estimate of urban green space water demand. However, for optimal results, this estimation should ideally be refined based on the specific health and aesthetic conditions of the urban vegetation. Our findings indicate that Kish Island has approximately 756.6 hectares of urban green spaces, which, combined with natural forests (3938.5 ha), cover a total of about 4695 hectares of the island. The annual water requirement for Kish Island's urban green space, calculated using the California method, is 5.12 million cubic meters. The highest water demand occurs from May to August, decreasing thereafter until January. Water demand then rises again with increasing temperatures and plant growth, following an annual cyclical pattern.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Vegetation Coefficient
  • Effective Precipitation
  • Irrigation Efficiency
  • Water requirement
  • Kish
  1. Adams, C. A., Druckman, P. B., & Picot, R. C. (2020). Sustainable development goals disclosure (SDGD) recommendations. ACCA: London, UK.‏
  2. Aldieri, L., Makkonen, T., & Vinci, C. P. (2020). Environmental knowledge spillovers and productivity: A patent analysis for large international firms in the energy, water and land resources fields. Resources Policy69, 101877.‏
  3. Allen, R. G., Dukes, M. D., Snyder, R. L., Kjelgren, R., & Kilic, A. (2020). A review of landscape water requirements using a multicomponent landscape coefficient. Transactions of the ASABE63(6), 2039-2058.‏
  4. Allen, R. G., Pereira, L. S., Howell, T. A., & Jensen, M. E. (2011). Evapotranspiration information reporting: I. Factors governing measurement accuracy. Agricultural Water Management98(6), 899-920.‏
  5. Barbosa, O., Tratalos, J. A., Armsworth, P. R., Davies, R. G., Fuller, R. A., Johnson, P., & Gaston, K. J. (2007). Who benefits from access to green space? A case study from Sheffield, UK. Landscape and Urban planning83(2-3), 187-195.‏
  6. Barnett, G., Doherty, M., & Beaty, M. (2005). Urban greenspace: connecting people and nature. Environment13(1), 1-10.‏
  7. Beeson Jr, R. C. (2006). Relationship of plant growth and actual evapotranspiration to irrigation frequency based on management allowed deficits for container nursery stock. Journal of the American society for horticultural science131(1).‏
  8. Bitar, H. (2004). Public aesthetic preferences and efficient water use in urban parks(pp. 246-249). University of Melbourne, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning.‏
  9. Byrne, J., Green, M., & Dallas, S. (2019). WSUD implementation in a precinct residential development: Perth case study. In Approaches to Water Sensitive Urban Design(pp. 541-559). Woodhead Publishing.‏
  10. Calera, A., Campos, I., Osann, A., D’Urso, G., & Menenti, M. (2017). Remote sensing for crop water management: From ET modelling to services for the end users. Sensors17(5), 1104.‏
  11. Costello, L. R. (1994). WUCOLS, water use classification of landscape species: a guide to the water needs of landscape plants. California Department of Water Resources.‏
  12. Costello, L. R., & Jones, K. S. (1999). WUCOLS III. A guide to estimating irrigation water needs of landscape plantings in California. University of California Cooperative Extension. California Department of Water Resources.‏
  13. Dang, X., Gao, S., Tao, R., Liu, G., Xia, Z., Fan, L., & Bi, W. (2020). Do environmental conservation programs contribute to sustainable livelihoods? Evidence from China's grain-for-green program in northern Shaanxi province. Science of the Total Environment719, 137436.‏
  14. Das, J., Rahman, A. S., Mandal, T., & Saha, P. (2021). Exploring driving forces of large-scale unsustainable groundwater development for irrigation in lower Ganga River basin in India. Environment, Development and Sustainability23, 7289-7309.‏
  15. Echeverría, J. M. A. (2021). Plan B water assessment: Efficiency and circularity for agricultural and municipal adaptation to water scarcity. Groundwater for Sustainable Development14, 100602.‏
  16. Elkatoury, A., & Alazba, A. A. (2024). Irrigation Water Demand Management-Based Innovative Strategy: Model Application on the Green Riyadh Initiative, Saudi Arabia. Water, 16(24), 3559.‏
  17. Fam, D., Mosley, E., Lopes, A., Mathieson, L., Morison, J., & Connellan, G. (2008). Irrigation of urban green spaces: A review of the environmental, social and economic benefits. CRC for Irrigation Futures Technical Report4(08).‏
  18. Fang, Z., Chen, J., Liu, G., Wang, H., Alatalo, J. M., Yang, Z., ... & Bai, Y. (2021). Framework of basin eco-compensation standard valuation for cross-regional water supply–A case study in northern China. Journal of Cleaner Production279, 123630.‏
  19. Fogliatto, S., Ferrero, A., & Vidotto, F. (2020). Current and future scenarios of glyphosate use in Europe: Are there alternatives?. Advances in agronomy163, 219-278.‏
  20. Guo, J., Niu, H., Xiao, D., Sun, X., & Fan, L. (2021). Urban green-space water-consumption characteristics and its driving factors in China. Ecological Indicators130, 108076.‏
  21. Hilaire, R. S., Arnold, M. A., Wilkerson, D. C., Devitt, D. A., Hurd, B. H., Lesikar, B. J., ... & Zoldoske, D. F. (2008). Efficient water use in residential urban landscapes. HortScience43(7), 2081-2092.‏
  22. Jim, C. Y., & Chen, W. Y. (2006). Impacts of urban environmental elements on residential housing prices in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and urban planning78(4), 422-434.‏
  23. Kjelgren, R., Rupp, L., & Kilgren, D. (2000). Water conservation in urban landscapes. HortScience35(6), 1037-1040.‏
  24. Kummu, M., Ward, P. J., De Moel, H., & Varis, O. (2010). Is physical water scarcity a new phenomenon? Global assessment of water shortage over the last two millennia. Environmental Research Letters5(3), 034006.‏
  25. Lowry Jr, J. H., Ramsey, R. D., & Kjelgren, R. K. (2011). Predicting urban forest growth and its impact on residential landscape water demand in a semiarid urban environment. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening10(3), 193-204.‏
  26. Mangani, R. T. (2021). Restoration after bush control and impact on ecosystem services in the Lephalale municipality, Limpopo Province(Doctoral dissertation, North-West University (South Africa)).‏
  27. Millward, A. A., & Sabir, S. (2011). Benefits of a forested urban park: What is the value of Allan Gardens to the city of Toronto, Canada?. Landscape and urban planning100(3), 177-188.‏
  28. Panahi, P., Jaafari, A., Asgari, H., Pourhashemi, M., & Hasaninejad, M. (2023). Comparing water requirements of urban landscape plants in an arid environment: An application of the WUCOLS method in the National Botanical Garden of Iran. Ecological Informatics, 78, 102390.‏
  29. Qiu, G. Y., Yan, C., & Liu, Y. (2023). Urban evapotranspiration and its effects on water budget and energy balance: Review and perspectives. Earth-Science Reviews, 104577.‏
  30. Ramaiah, M., & Avtar, R. (2025). Daily Water Requirements of Vegetation in the Urban Green Spaces in the City of Panaji, India.‏
  31. Rana, G., & Katerji, N. (2000). Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: a review. European Journal of agronomy13(2-3), 125-153.‏
  32. Rosegrant, M. W., Cai, X., & Cline, S. A. (2020). Water and food to 2025. IFPRI and IWMI Report.‏
  33. Rosenberg, D. E., Kopp, K., Kratsch, H. A., Rupp, L., Johnson, P., & Kjelgren, R. (2011). Value Landscape Engineering: Identifying Costs, Water Use, Labor, and Impacts to Support Landscape Choice 1. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association47(3), 635-649.‏
  34. Salvador, R., Bautista-Capetillo, C., & Playán, E. (2011). Irrigation performance in private urban landscapes: A study case in Zaragoza (Spain). Landscape and Urban Planning100(3), 302-311.‏
  35. Scheiber, S. M., & Beeson, R. C. (2007). Landscape growth and aesthetic quality of coleus managed with irrigation deficits. HortTechnology17(4), 561-566.‏
  36. Silva, J. K. D., Nunes, L. G. C. F., Soares, A. E. P., & Silva, S. R. D. (2017). Assessment of water-saving equipment to support the urban management of water. RBRH22.‏
  37. Hilaire, R., Arnold, M. A., Wilkerson, D. C., Devitt, D. A., Hurd, B. H., Lesikar, B. J., ... Zoldoske, D. F. (2008). Efficient water uses in residential urban landscapes. HortSci., 43(7), 2081- 2092.
  38. Toosi, G. (2023). Influence of vegetation in the flood drainage ditch. Journal of Civil Engineering Researchers, 5(4), 16-21.‏

White, R., Havalak, R., Nations, J., Thomas, J., Chalmers, D., & Dewey, D. (2004). How much water is enough? Using pet to develop water budgets for residential landscapes. Texas Water Resources Institute.