ارزیابی اثرات عملیات بیابان‌زدایی در وضعیت اقتصادی-اجتماعی جوامع محلی اهواز

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

2 مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان خوزستان

3 موسسه تحقیقات جنگل‌ها و مراتع کشور

‎10.22052/deej.2021.11.34.51

چکیده

طرح‌های بیابان‌زدایی همواره با هدف حفاظت آب و خاک و توسعۀ پایدار جوامع محلی طراحی و اجرا شده و ارزیابی اثرات اقتصادی-اجتماعی این طرح‌ها به‌منظور بهبود نقاط قوت و شناسایی و رفع چالش‌ها دارای اهمیت زیادی است. بدین منظور تحقیق حاضر با هدف ارزیابی اثرات اقتصادی-اجتماعی اقدامات بیابان‌زدایی اجراشده در منطقۀ جنوب شرق اهواز در استان خوزستان در سال 1400 انجام شد. جامعۀ آماری شامل دو گروه ساکنان روستایی و کارشناسان آشنا و مرتبط با موضوع مورد مطالعه بودند. 335 نفر روستایی بر اساس فرمول کوکران و تطبیق با جدول کرجسی و مورگان، به‌عنوان نمونه‌های مطالعاتی انتخاب و به روش تصادفی در تکمیل پرسشنامه‌ها مشارکت داشتند. همچنین 26 کارشناس در انجام تحقیق مشارکت کردند. اولویت‌بندی اثرات اقتصادی و اجتماعی از طریق میانگین رتبه‌ای و مقایسۀ دیدگاه ساکنان روستایی و کارشناسان با استفاده از آزمون من‌وایت‌نی انجام شد. مطابق نتایج، بهبود وضعیت شغلی و اشتغال‌زایی با میانگین 20/4 از دیدگاه بهره‌برداران و حفاظت آب و خاک و کاهش گردوغبار با میانگین 46/4 از دیدگاه کارشناسان مهم‌ترین اثرات اجرای طرح‌های بیابان‌زدایی بوده است. تفاوت آماری معناداری بین نظرات کارشناسان و روستائیان در خصوص اثرات اقتصادی اجرای طرح‌ها وجود داشت (05/0P < /span><) اما در خصوص اثرات اجتماعی اجرای طرح‌های بیابان‌زدایی، تفاوت معنی‌داری مشاهده نشد (05/0
).

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluating the Effects of Desertification Combating Projects on the Socio-Economic Conditions of Local Communities in Ahvaz

نویسندگان [English]

  • Asghar Farajollahi 1
  • Seyed Abdolhossein Arami 2
  • Yaser Ghasemi Aryan 3
1
2
3
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Desertification combating projects are usually developed and implemented to protect water and soil and keep sustainable development of local communities. Therefore, evaluating the socio-economic effects of such projects is highly important for identifying and addressing the challenges involved in this regard and perpetuating their positive effects. Thus, this study sought to evaluate the socio-economic effects of the desertification projects and plans implemented in the southeastern region of Ahvaz in 2021.

Materials and methods: this study used the documentary method to investigate the theoretical dimensions of the subject and a survey method to collect the required quantitative data. The study's statistical population consisted of two groups of rural residents and experts familiar with the study area. Based on Cochran's formula and matching with Krejcie and Morgan's table, 335 rural residents were selected to participate in the study, using random sampling. Moreover, 26 experts participated in completing the questionnaires and conducting the research. After confirming the questionnaire's validity, Cronbach's alpha coefficient was obtained as 0.86 and 0.83 for rural residents and experts, respectively. On the other hand, the prioritization of the economic and social effects of the projects was performed through the average rankings. Finally, the mean comparison of the viewpoints of rural residents and experts was assessed through a Mann-Whitney test.

Results: According to the study's results, improving the employment opportunities and job creation, increasing the price of land in the region, and reducing the migration incentives are ranked first to third in terms of priority from the rural residents' viewpoints with the average values of 4.20, 4.15, and 4.12, respectively, followed by the influence of water and soil protection, dust reduction, and the participation of the local community in the implementation of desertification combating plans and operations, respectively. Moreover, the analysis of the experts' opinions showed that water and soil protection, dust reduction, increases in land prices, improvement of employment opportunities, reduction in migration incentives, and increases in the level of the local and rural communities' trust in goals and programs of executive departments were the most important effects of project implementation in the region with the average values of 4.46, 4.31, 4.19, 4.15 and 4.11, respectively.
The mean values of the desertification combating projects were compared between the rural residents' viewpoints and experts' opinions using the Mann-Whitney test, revealing a statistically significant difference between the opinions of rural residents and experts in terms of the effects of water and soil protection and dust reduction, increases in the villagers' revenues, diversification of the villagers' income sources, and strengthening the cooperation and social cohesion among local communities. All of these items had a higher average rank in the experts' viewpoint except for "strengthening the cooperation and social cohesion among local communities. Experts significantly out-evaluated the consequences of the implemented combating desertification projects concerning the water and soil protection, dust reduction, increases in the villagers' revenues, and creation of a variety of new income resources compared to the rural residents. In other items regarding the effects of the projects, no statistically significant difference was found between the viewpoints expressed by residents and experts. As for the economic effects, there was a statistically significant difference between the experts' and rural residents' viewpoints (P<0.05), with the implementation of projects having more significant prominent effects in the experts' view. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the viewpoints offered by experts and residents in terms of the social effects of combating desertification projects (P>0.05).

Discussion and Conclusion: According to the viewpoints expressed by both experts and rural residents, water and soil protection, dust reduction, improvement of job opportunities, increases in the price of land in the studied region, and reduction in migration incentives are the most important economic and social consequences of desertification combating projects. Moreover, the viewpoints of experts and rural residents of the region concerning the economic and social consequences of the projects were close to each other and did not differ significantly, indicating their mutual understanding and intellectual proximity of the issue. Therefore, it appears that strengthening such a relationship helps desertification combating projects to be more successful. The results of this study also showed positive and acceptable effects of the projects in the study area. In fact, the implementation of such projects has improved the conditions for the sustainability and activity of rural communities. However, new plans should be developed for improving the welfare status, increasing the revenues, improving the water quality, increasing the production of crops, and increasing horticulture products. On the other hand, attracting the stakeholders' participation by promoting conservation knowledge and culture, using the potentials and capacities of the region, and providing the necessary facilities and financial support in terms of combating desertification goals and measures can help increase the chances for the success of desertification combating projects.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Employment
  • Khuzestan
  • Rural Residents
  • Desertification combating projects
  • Experts
  • Dust
  • Migration
  1. Afshari nia, M., Vali, A. 2021. Survey of the effectiveness of desert management plans on the inhabitants of the desert ecosystem (Case study: Kashan). Water and Soil Management and Modelling 1(1), 40-50 (In Persian).
  2. Ahmadi, H., Jafarian Jeloudar, Z. 2004. Effect of combat to desertification projects on socio-economic situation of Kerman city. Desert 9(2), 207-225 (In Persian).
  3. Amiraslani, F., Dragovich, D. 2011. Combating desertification in Iran over the last 50 years: an overview of changing approaches. Journal of Environmental Management 92(1), 1-13.
  4. Amiraslani, F., Dragovich, D., Caiserman, A. 2018. A long-term cost-benefit analysis of national anti-desertification plans in Iran. Desert 23(1), 141-151.
  5. Basiry, Z., Rostami, N., Saleh pour jam, A. 2020. Identification and prioritization of effective indicators on preventing sustainable participation of Rural Societies in combating desertification plans (Case Study: Mousian Region, Dehloran). Journal of Spatial Analysis Environmental Hazards 7 (3), 47-60.
  6. Chen, Y., Tang, H. 2005. Desertification in north China: Background, anthropogenic impacts and failures in combating it. Land Degradation Development 16, 367–376.
  7. Emami, N., Ahmadpour, A., Abedi Sarvestani, A., Shahraki, M.R. 2018. Investigating the Effect of Carbon Sequestration Project on Local Community Empowerment: A Case of Tilabad Watershed in Golestan Province. Agricultural Extension and Education Research 10(4), 23-36.
  8. Farajollahi, A., Ghasemi Aryan, Y., Hamidian, M. 2021. Evaluation the socio-economic impacts of rangeland management plans in Kalaleh County from the viewpoint of stakeholders and experts. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation 9 (18), 19-35 (In Persian).
  9. Haqqani, J., Noush Afarin, B., Ansari, M. 2007. Assessment of plantation forest management. Journal of the Forests and Rangelands 74, 71-75 (In Persian).
  10. Javaheri Shirazi, M.A., Khoshbakht, M. 2012. "Study and evaluation of combating desertification projects in the west of Karkheh in Ahvaz and its effect on the socio-economic status of local people." 3 th national conference on combating desertification and sustainable development of Iran Desert Wetlands (Relying on Meighan Desert Wetland), Arak (In Persian).
  11. Kalantari, Kh. 2010. Data processing and analysis in socio-economic research. Farhang Saba Publications, 388p (In Persian).
  12. Madadi, E., Maleki, M. 2018. Socio-economic impact assessment of the implemented natural resource projects from the Stakeholders perspectives (Case Study: Watershed Andabil- Khalkhal City). Journal of Rangeland 12(3), 267-279.
  13. Maleki, H. 2014. Effect of Combating Desertification Projects on Socio-Economic Status of Rural Communities (Case Study: Sarchah Amari Khoosf, South Khorasan Province). M.Sc. Thesis in Combat Desertification Science, Zabol University. (In Persian).
  14. Nateghi, D. 2000. A new viewpoint of the desert. Tehran, Combating Desertification Technical Office, 1999 report, p.15 (In Persian).
  15. National Statistics Portal. 2021. Statistics Center of Iran, Results of the General Census of Population and Housing in 2016, Khuzestan Province. (In Persian)
  16. Nejadi, F., Abbasi, E., Choobchian, Sh. 2017. The role of combating desertification projects in promotion of local people’s social capital (the case of Shahdad carbon sequestration project), Journal of Rural Research 7(4), 604-617 (In Persian).
  17. Reynolds, J.F., Grainger, A., Stafford Smith, D.M., Bastin, G., Garcia-Barrios, L., Fernández, R.J., Janssen, M.A., Jürgens, N., Scholes, R.J., Veldkamp, A., et al. 2011. Scientific concepts for an integrated analysis of desertification. Land Degradation Development 22, 166-183.
  18. Sarmad, Z., Bazargan, A., Hejazi, A. 2014. Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences, Agha Publications, 408 p (In Persian).
  19. Sarparast, M., Ownegh, M., Sepehr, A., 2020. Evaluating the impacts of combating-action programs on desertification hazard trends: A case study of Taybad-Bakharz region, Northeastern Iran. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators 7, 100043.
  20. Seyed Akhlaghi, S.J., Miri Soleiman, J. 2018. Investigation and evaluation of socio-economic effects of participatory combating desertification projects in Sistan and Baluchestan province. Research project, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO) Tehran. 88 p (In Persian).
  21. Soltaninejad, M., Javari, M., Noroozi, A., Javadi, S. 2019. Evaluation of vegetation changes in desertification projects using RS-GIS techniques. Journal of Arid Biome 9(1), 153-165 (In Persian).
  22. Abasali, Vali, A.A., Mousavi, S.H., Zarepour, M. 2018. Assessment of combat to desertification projects based on the vegetation criteria in Aran and Bidgol. Desert Ecosystem Engineering Journal 7(19), 63-80 (In Persian).
  23. Wang, T., Xue, X., Zhou, L., Guo, J. 2015. Combating Aeolian desertification in northern China. Land Degradation Development 26, 118–132.
  24. Xu, D., Song, A., Song, X. 2017. Assessing the effect of desertification controlling projects and policies in northern Shaanxi Province, China by integrating remote sensing and farmer investigation data. Frontiers of earth science 11(4), 689-701.
  25. Zehtabian, Gh., Khosravi, H., Masoudi, R. 2014. Models of Desertification Assessment (Criteria and Indices). University of Tehran Press, First Edition, 260 p (In Persian).
  26. Zhenghu, D., Hanglang, X., Xinrong, L., Zhibao, D., Gang, W. 2004. Evolution of soil properties on stabilized sands in the Tengger Desert. China, Geomorphology 59, 237-246.