تأثیر باکتری‌های محرک رشد Bacillus amyloliquefaciens و‌ Bacillus halotolerans و کاربرد بیوسالیدز بر خصوصیات فیزیولوژِیکی گیاه Salvia hispanica تحت شرایط شوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی مقطع دکتری مدیریت و کنترل بیابان دانشگاه یزد، یزد

2 دانشگاه یزد، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و کویر‌شناسی -گروه مدیریت مناطق خشک و بیابانی

3 دانشگاه یزد، دانشکده علوم پایه -گروه زیست ‌شناسی

‎10.22052/deej.2026.257979.1126

چکیده

این پژوهش به‌صورت آزمایش فاکتوریل سه‌عاملی در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار و به‌مدت شش ماه در شرایط مزرعه اجرا شد. فاکتورهای موردبررسی شامل باکتری محرک رشد گیاه (چهار سطح: عدم تلقیح، تلقیح با Bacillus halotolerans، تلقیح با Bacillus amyloliquefaciens و تلقیح همزمان دو باکتری)، تنش شوری آب آبیاری (چهار سطح: شاهد ۰.۳، ۴، ۸ و ۱۲ دسی‌زیمنس بر متر) و بیوسالیدز (سه سطح: عدم کاربرد، کاربرد ۱۰ و ۳۰ تن در هکتار) بود. نتایج نشان داد شوری تأثیر معنی‌داری بر کاهش جذب عناصر داشت، به‌طوری‌که جذب فسفر (۲۰.۳٪)، پتاسیم (۳۲.۶٪)، کلسیم (۳۱.۷٪) و کلروفیل (۱۴.۱٪) کاهش یافت. در مقابل، تنش شوری منجر به افزایش آنتی‌اکسیدان‌ها (۱۶۰.۳٪)، فنل کل (۸۸.۲٪) و پرولین (۱۱۲٪) شد.کاربرد همزمان بیوسالیدز و باکتری، مقدار منیزیم و کلسیم برگ را به‌ترتیب ۱۰ و ۱۱ درصد افزایش داد. در شرایط آبیاری با آب شور، باکتری‌ها جذب پتاسیم (۳۲.۴٪)، کلسیم (۳۷.۶٪) و فسفر (۶۰.۱٪) را افزایش و جذب سدیم را ۳۲.۵ درصد کاهش دادند. تلقیح باکتریایی به‌ویژه ترکیب دو باکتری، قندهای محلول (۳۹.۳٪) و پرولین (۱۳۷.۷٪) را افزایش و آنتی‌اکسیدان‌ها (۱۱۰.۲٪) و فنل (۶۵.۳٪) را کاهش داد.درنهایت، تلقیح باکتری‌هاB. halotolerans  و B. amyloliquefaciens تحمل گیاه به شوری را بهبود بخشید. این نتایج بر ضرورت ادغام رویکردهای میکروبیولوژیک و مدیریت منابع آلی در برنامه‌های اصلاح اراضی شور تأکید دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Effect of the Growth-Promoting Bacteria Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus halotolerans and the Application of Biosolids on the Physiological Characteristics of Salvia hispanica Under Saline Conditions

نویسندگان [English]

  • RAMAZAN GHOBADPOOR GHORD 1
  • Mohammad Ali Hakimzadeh Ardakani 2
  • Asghar Mosleh Arani 2
  • Hamid Sodaeizadeh 2
  • Maryam El-Sadat Mirbagheri Firouzabad 3
1 PhD Student in Desert Management and Control, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Yazd University, Faculty of Natural Resources and Desert Studies - Department of Arid and Desert Management,
3 Yazd University, Faculty of Basic Sciences-Department of Biology,
چکیده [English]

Introduction
Salinity stress, resulting from the accumulation of salts in the soil, is one of the most common environmental stresses in arid regions, disrupting plant growth and productivity. Numerous efforts are underway to develop sustainable solutions to enhance plant resistance to environmental stresses. In this regard, the use of innovative approaches such as plant breeding, soil improvement, and biotechnology has become a major research priority at the global level. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) can neutralize the destructive effects of stress and enhance plant performance by utilizing adaptive mechanisms. These microorganisms improve plant growth and development indicators through several mechanisms, acting either directly or indirectly. The direct effects of these bacteria include increasing nutrient availability through the solubilization of poorly soluble compounds, the production of siderophores, the activity of ACC deaminase, the synthesis of plant hormones, and nitrogen fixation. Their indirect effects, operating through competitive or inhibitory mechanisms—such as competition with pathogens, production of antibiotics, fungicidal compounds, lytic enzymes, and hydrogen cyanide—reduce the harmful effects of pathogens and promote plant growth. Meanwhile, biosolids have been increasingly considered as a sustainable solution that contributes to plant growth and soil nutrient cycling through biological processes.
Materials and Methods
This research was conducted as a three-factorial factorial experiment within a completely randomized block design with three replications over a period of four months (from March 2024 to the end of June 2025) under field conditions in the lands of Ziaratgah village, Shahreza city, Isfahan province, with geographical coordinates of 584514 and 3531579 UTM. The experimental factors included: plant growth-promoting bacteria at four levels (no bacterial inoculation, inoculation with Bacillus halotolerans, inoculation with Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, and simultaneous inoculation with both bacteria); salinity at four levels (irrigation water with a salinity of 0.3 dS/m as control, and salinities of 4, 8, and 12 dS/m); and biosolids at three levels (no biosolids application, and biosolids application at 10 and 30 tons/ha). Soil salinity was monitored during the experimental period using an EC meter, with soil samples collected from a depth of 0 to 30 cm once per month. In each plot, after seed germination and growth to a height of 10 cm, 15 plants were maintained following secondary tillage to achieve uniform density. Blocks were spaced one meter apart, and within each block, 1 × 1 m plots were placed 1.5 m apart. In each plot, four rows of crops were designed with a spacing of 30 cm between rows and 25 cm within rows. Before the experiment, the physical and chemical properties of the soil sample (Table 1) and the biosolids sample (Table 2) were determined. Chia seeds used in this study were provided by Pakan Bazr Company of Isfahan. Biosolids were obtained from urban sewage from the Shahreza urban sewage treatment plant and were air-dried. The dried sludge was subsequently crushed and passed through a No. 20 sieve with openings of 850 μm before use. For plant growth-promoting bacteria, 100 mL of suspension with an approximate cell density of 3 × 10⁸ CFU/mL of each bacterium, as well as a mixture of both, were prepared. Seed inoculation was performed at the beginning of cultivation in the field. For the control group, only the liquid culture medium without bacteria was used instead of the bacterial suspension. Seeds were placed in the suspension of each bacterium for two hours before cultivation. A period of four months elapsed from seed cultivation (beginning in March 2024) to the harvest of plant samples. Subsequently, the mineral elements of the leaves, as well as proline, soluble sugars, total phenols, chlorophyll, and total antioxidants, were measured. Data analysis was performed using SPSS 26 software, and graphs were generated in Excel. The normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Differences between levels were evaluated through analysis of variance (ANOVA). Finally, mean comparisons were performed using Duncan's test at a significance level of 0.05.
Result
The results showed that salinity had a significant effect on reducing the absorption of elements. Specifically, the absorption of phosphorus (20.3%), potassium (32.6%), and calcium (31.7%), as well as chlorophyll content (14.1%), decreased. In contrast, salinity stress led to an increase in antioxidants (160.3%), total phenols (88.2%), and proline (112%). The simultaneous application of biosolids and bacteria increased the amounts of magnesium and calcium in the leaves by 10% and 11%, respectively. Under saline water irrigation conditions, bacterial inoculation increased the absorption of potassium (32.4%), calcium (37.6%), and phosphorus (60.1%), while decreasing sodium absorption by 32.5%. Bacterial inoculation, particularly the combination of both bacteria, increased soluble sugars (39.3%) and proline (137.7%), while decreasing antioxidants (110.2%) and phenols (65.3%).
Discussion and Conclusion
This study demonstrated that salinity represents a major challenge for plants by disrupting ionic homeostasis and inducing oxidative stress. However, inoculation with Bacillus halotolerans and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens—particularly in combination—improves the tolerance of chia (Salvia hispanica) to salinity levels of up to 8 dS/m through multiple mechanisms, including the modulation of element uptake, increased osmolyte accumulation, and enhancement of the antioxidant system. In contrast, the use of biosolids alone does not constitute an effective strategy; nevertheless, their potential to interact with microorganisms in providing mineral elements is significant. The findings of the present study emphasize the necessity of integrating microbiological approaches and organic resource management in saline land reclamation programs. Such integration can significantly reduce the damages caused by soil salinization, strengthen plant resistance mechanisms, and, through this, positively affect the physiological performance of chia plants, which will in turn yield favorable economic outcomes.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Salty Land Reclamation
  • Biocontrol
  • Proline
  • Chlorophyll
  1. Ahmadi, M., Rezaei, N., & Karami, A. (2019). Effect of salinity on growth and performance of rangeland species in arid regions. Iranian Journal of Rangeland and Desert Research, *27*(3), 45–60.
  2. Anjum, N. A., Ahmad, I., Mohmood, I., Pacheco, M., Duarte, A. C., Pereira, E., & Prasad, M. N. V. (2017). Modulation of glutathione and its related enzymes in plants’ responses to toxic metals and metalloids—A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany, *75*, 307–324.
  3. Ashraf, M., & Harris, P. J. C. (2005). Abiotic stresses: Plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. Haworth Press.
  4. Atta, M. I., Bakhsh, A., Arshad, M., & Ullah, S. (2023). Soil salinity: A global threat to sustainable agriculture. In Climate change impacts on agriculture (pp. 301–320). Springer.
  5. Chen, M., Yang, Z., Liu, J., Zhu, T., Wei, X., Fan, H., & Wang, B. (2018). Adaptation mechanism of salt excluders under saline conditions and its applications. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, *19*(11), 1–13.
  6. Etesami, H., & Beattie, G. A. (2010). Mining halophytes for plant growth-promoting halotolerant bacteria to enhance the salinity tolerance of non-halophytic crops. Frontiers in Microbiology, *9*, 148.
  7. Evans, M. L., Hikawa, H., & Estelle, M. A. (1994). Responses of Arabidopsis roots to auxin studied with high temporal resolution: Comparison of wild type and auxin-response mutants. Planta, *194*, 215–222.
  8. Gothwal, R. K., Nigam, V. K., Mohan, M. K., Sasmal, D., & Ghosh, P. (2007). Screening of nitrogen fixers from rhizospheric bacterial isolates associated with important desert plants. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, *6*, 101–109.
  9. Habib, S. H., Kausar, H., & Saud, H. M. (2016). Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria enhance salinity stress tolerance in okra through ROS-scavenging enzymes. BioMed Research International, *2016*, Article 6284547.
  10. Hadi, M. R., & Karimi, N. (2012). The role of calcium in plant’s salt tolerance. Journal of Plant Nutrition, *35*(13), 2037–2054.
  11. Haji Abadi, A., Mosleh Arani, A., Ghasemi, S., Hadi Rad, M., Shahbazi, Sh., & Etesami, H. (2021). [Study on the effect of growth promoting potential of rhizobacteria isolated from some halophyte rangeland species on vegetative growth and ion content of wheat]. Journal of New Findings in Biological Sciences, *8*(2), 104–117. [In Persian]
  12. Hanaa, H., & Safaa, A. (2005). Foliar application of IAA at different growth stages and their influenced on growth and productivity of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum l.). Journal of Physics: Conference Series, *1294*(9), 092019.
  13. Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M., Zulfiqar, F, Raza, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mahmud, J. A., Fujita, M, & Fotopoulos, V. (2020). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants, *9*(8), 681.
  14. Idris, E. E., Iglesias, D. J., Talon, M., & Borriss, R. (2007). Tryptophan-dependent production of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) affects level of plant growth promotion by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, *20*(6), 619–626.
  15. Jha, C. K., & Saraf, M. (2015). Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review. Journal of Agricultural Research and Development, *5*(2), 108–119.
  16. Khalid, W., Arshad, M. S., Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Różańska, M. B., Irfan, S., Shafique, B., & Kędzierska-Matysek, M. (2022). Chia seeds (Salvia hispanica): A therapeutic weapon in metabolic disorders. Food Science & Nutrition, *11*(1), 3–16.
  17. Kumar, J., Singh, S., Singh, M., Srivastava, P. K., Mishra, R. K., & Singh, V. P. (2017). Transcriptional regulation of salinity stress in plants: A short review. Plant Gene, *11*, 160–169.
  18. Maksimovic, I., & Ilin, Ž. (2012). Effects of salinity on vegetable growth and nutrients uptake. In T. S. Lee (Ed.), Irrigation systems and practices in challenging environments (pp. 169–190). IntechOpen.
  19. Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, *59*, 651–681.
  20. Najafi Zilaei, M., Mosleh Arani, A., Etesami, H., Dinarvand, M. (2022). [Investigation of the effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on morphological and physiological characteristics of three halophyte species (Nitraria schoberi, Haloxylon aphyllum, and Seidlitzia rosmarinus) under salinity and dust stresses] [Doctoral dissertation, Yazd University]. [In Persian]
  21. Nawaz, A., Shahbaz, M., Asadullah, Imran, A., Marghoob, M. U., Imtiaz, M., & Mubeen, F. (2020). Potential of salt tolerant PGPR in growth and yield augmentation of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under saline conditions. Frontiers in Microbiology, *11*, 201.
  22. Oraei, M., Tabatabaei, S. J., Fallahi, E., & Imani, A. (2009). The effects of salinity stress and rootstock on the growth, photosynthetic rate, nutrient and sodium concentrations of almond. Journal of Horticulture Science and Biotechnology, *23*(2), 121–140. [Note: Journal title may need verification for standard English title]
  23. Pereira, L. B., Andrade, G. S., Meneghin, S. P., Vicentini, R., & Ottoboni, L. M. M. (2019). Prospecting plant growth-promoting bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of sugarcane under drought stress. Current Microbiology, *76*, 1345–1354.
  24. Saddiq, M. S., Afzal, I., Basra, S. M. A., Iqbal, S., & Ashraf, M. (2020). Sodium exclusion affects seed yield and physiological traits of wheat genotypes grown under salt stress. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, *20*(3), 1442–1456.
  25. Sadeghian, M., Askari, H., Soltani Najaf Abadi, M., & Nematzadeh, G. (2018). [The effect of salinity-resistant plant growth-promoting bacteria on growth and resistance of wheat under salinity stress conditions]. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, *49*(1), 45–56. [In Persian]
  26. Sashidhar, B., & Podile, A. R. (2010). Mineral phosphate solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria and scope for manipulation of the direct oxidation pathway involving glucose dehydrogenase. Journal of Applied Microbiology, *109*(1), 1–12.
  27. Singh, R., & Jha, P. (2017). The PGPR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia SBP-9 augments resistance against biotic and abiotic stress in wheat plants. Frontiers in Microbiology, *8*, 1945.
  28. Soni, S. K., Singh, R., Singh, M., Awasthi, A., Wasnik, K., Kalra, A., & Gupta, V. K. (2021). Salt-tolerant and plant growth-promoting Bacillus isolated from saline soil enhance plant growth of Triticum aestivum (L.). 3 Biotech, *11*(1), 18.
  29. Tannour, S., Author, B., & Colleague, C. (2024). Title of the study on B. halotolerans. Journal Name, Volume(Issue),. *1/*(1), 11.
  30. Wang, R., Wang, C., Feng, Q., Liou, R. M., & Lin, Y. F. (2021). Biological inoculant of salt-tolerant bacteria for plant growth stimulation under different saline soil conditions. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, *31*(3), 398–407.
  31. Waling, I., Vark, W. V., Houba, V. J. G., & Van der Lee, J. J. (1989). Soil and plant analysis, Part 7: Plant analysis procedures. Wageningen Agriculture University.
  32. Zafar-ul-Hye, M., Bhutta, T. S., Shaaban, M., Hussain, S., Qayyum, M. F., Aslam, U., & Zahir, Z. A. (2019). Influence of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial inoculation on wheat productivity under soil salinity stress. Phyton, *88*(2), 119–129.
  33. Zhang, H., Xie, X., Kim, M. S., Kornyeyev, D. A., Holaday, S., & Paré, P. W. (2008). Soil bacteria augment Arabidopsis photosynthesis by decreasing glucose sensing and abscisic acid levels in planta. The Plant Journal, *56*(2), 264–273.
  34. Zhang, X., Fan, X., Li, C., & Nan, Z. (2010). Effects of cadmium stress on seed germination, seedling growth and antioxidative enzymes in Achnatherum inebrians plants infected with a Neotyphodium endophyte. Plant Growth Regulation, *60*, 91–97.
  35. Zhao, Y., Lu, Z., & He, L. (2014). Effects of saline-alkaline stress on seed germination and seedling growth of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, *173*, 1680–1691.
  36. Alikhani, H. A., Etesami, H., & Mohammadi, L. (2018). [Evaluation of the effect of rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric phosphate solubilizing bacteria on improving growth indices of wheat under salinity and drought stress]. Soil Biology Journal, *6*(1), 1–15. [In Persian]