کاوش و تحلیل دانش بومی برای زندگی پایدار در مناطق بیابانی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات اقتصادی - اجتماعی و ترویج کشاورزی، مرکز تحققیات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان سمنان، سازمان تحقیقات،

2 استادیار پژوهشی بخش تحقیقات بیابان، موسسه تحقیقات جنگلها و مراتع کشور، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، تهران، ایران

‎10.22052/deej.2025.257176.1112

چکیده

بیابان‌زایی یکی از مهلک‌ترین خطراتی است که در هزارۀ سوم میلادی، حیات را در تمامی ابعادش مورد تهدید قرار داده است. بنا بر اهمیت این موضوع، پژوهش حاضر با هدف شناسایی و تحلیل دانش بومی جوامع محلی شهرستان گرمسار در راستای زندگی پایدار در مناطق بیابانی انجام شده ‌است. این مطالعه با رویکرد کیفی و روش تحلیل مضمونی صورت ‌گرفته ‌است. داده‌ها ازطریق مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با خبرگان محلی گردآوری شد و پس از کدگذاری اولیه، به استخراج مضامین انجامید. یافته‌ها نشان داد که دانش بومی منطقه، ساختاری منسجم و منطبق با شرایط اکولوژیکی بیابانی دارد و شامل هفت مضمون اصلی است: مدیریت بومی منابع آب و خاک، احیای زیرساخت‌های سنتی، توسعۀ منابع انسانی، کشاورزی سازگار با خشکسالی، مدیریت دیم‌زارها، تلفیق دانش بومی و نوین و حفاظت بومی از خاک. این مضامین بازتابی از تجربه‌های میان‌نسلی و راهبردهای محلی برای مقابله با خشکسالی، فرسایش و کاهش منابع آبی هستند. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که دانش بومی، ابزاری اثربخش در توسعۀ پایدار و سازگاری با تغییرات اقلیمی در مناطق خشک است و می‌تواند مکملی مهم برای سیاست‌های رسمی مدیریت منابع طبیعی باشد. پیشنهاد می‌شود این دانش در برنامه‌ریزی‌های منطقه‌ای و سیاست‌های بیابان‌زدایی مورد بهره‌برداری قرار گیرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Exploration and Analysis of Indigenous Knowledge for Sustainable Living in Desert Regions

نویسندگان [English]

  • Masoumeh Pazoki 1
  • Seyed Jafar Seyed Akhlaghi 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Agricultural Economic, Social and Extension Research, Agricultural Research and Education Center and Natural Resources of Semnan Province, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization
2 Assistant Professor, Desert Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Arid and semi-arid regions are among the most ecologically fragile ecosystems on Earth. Environmental stressors in these zones—including water scarcity, soil degradation, and extreme temperature fluctuations—inhibit the establishment of sufficient vegetative cover, thereby hindering erosion control and ecological balance. Persistent threats from desertification further challenge environmental resilience and the sustainability of local livelihoods.
Within this context, Indigenous Knowledge Systems (IKS)—understood as dynamic, experiential, and place-based knowledge developed through the long-term interaction of local communities with their environments—play a critical role. These knowledge systems offer practical solutions for natural resource management, particularly in soil and water conservation, sustainable agriculture, and climate adaptation. However, in many arid regions, notably Iran, this invaluable body of knowledge is increasingly threatened by marginalization, a lack of formal documentation, and methodological neglect in mainstream planning.
This study seeks to address this gap by systematically identifying, analyzing, and synthesizing the key components of indigenous knowledge related to environmental and livelihood sustainability in Garmsar County, an arid region of Iran. Transmitted informally across generations, this knowledge remains underutilized in contemporary policy and development planning. By documenting and integrating it into regional strategies, there is significant potential to enhance ecological resilience and foster community-based sustainable development.
 
Methodology: This study adopted a qualitative approach, utilizing thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) to investigate the structure and content of indigenous knowledge. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 15 key informants—including local elders, farmers, pastoralists, and holders of traditional ecological knowledge—selected for their deep-rooted experience in agriculture and resource management within desert landscapes. Participants were identified through purposive sampling to ensure they met predefined criteria of expertise and long-term local engagement. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was achieved.
The analysis followed Braun and Clarke's (2006) six-step model: (1) familiarization with the data, (2) generation of initial codes, (3) searching for themes, (4) reviewing themes, (5) defining and naming themes, and (6) producing the final report. To ensure analytical rigor, inter-coder reliability was assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. The calculated value of 0.6875 (p < 0.0005) indicates a strong level of agreement and consistency between coders.
 
Results: Thematic analysis identified seven core themes that reflect the structure and application of indigenous knowledge for sustainable living in Garmsar County. These themes encompass strategies for resource management, social organization, and adaptive practice.

Indigenous Water and Soil Conservation: This theme encompasses techniques directly aimed at combating desertification. Practices include constructing earthen bunds and stone lines for erosion control, employing rainfall harvesting calendars, and applying ash or burying organic waste to enhance soil moisture retention and fertility.
Revitalization of Traditional Hydraulic Infrastructure: A key finding is the community-led restoration and maintenance of traditional water systems, such as qanats (subterranean canals) and cisterns. This revitalization often occurs through collaborative efforts aligned with local development projects.
Knowledge Transmission and Community Cohesion: Indigenous knowledge is actively sustained through intergenerational exchange. Mechanisms include localized oral education, storytelling, and the purposeful involvement of youth and women in traditional practices, which reinforces social cohesion and cultural identity.
Climate-Resilient Agronomic Practices: Adaptive agricultural strategies are central to livelihood sustainability. These include cultivating drought-resistant native crops (e.g., millet, sesame), utilizing flexible planting schedules based on traditional phenological calendars, and employing dryland farming techniques.
Customary Land and Resource Governance: The sustainable management of farms and rangelands is guided by established customary norms. Practices such as regulated seasonal grazing, crop rotation, and contour plowing are communally upheld to optimize the use of marginal ecosystems.
Synergistic Integration with Scientific Knowledge: Findings reveal a practical co-production of knowledge, where modern tools (e.g., soil moisture sensors) are strategically integrated with local experiential wisdom. This synergy enhances decision-making without displacing indigenous systems.
Ecologically-Based Soil Fertility Management: Traditional soil enrichment relies on low-external-input methods. These include the application of ash, in-situ decomposition of organic matter, and biological pest management, which collectively maintain long-term soil productivity.

 
Discussion and Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the indigenous knowledge system of Garmsar County functions not as static historical memory but as a dynamic, living framework—one that is responsive, adaptive, and grounded in a deep ecological logic. The documented techniques are deeply embedded within local social structures and are continuously informed by collective, long-term environmental experience.
The analysis reveals that the revitalization of traditional infrastructure, particularly when coupled with appropriate institutional support, presents a viable pathway for bridging formal development goals with community-based resilience. Furthermore, the intergenerational transmission of knowledge and the empowerment of marginalized groups are critical social mechanisms that reinforce the system's long-term sustainability. These findings align with international perspectives, such as that of the UN Scientific Advisory Board (2016), which recognizes local and indigenous knowledge as a foundational pillar for achieving climate resilience and the Sustainable Development Goals.

Significantly, the observed integration of traditional practices with modern technologies illustrates a productive model of knowledge co-creation. This synergy, as corroborated by global research (e.g., Pretty et al., 2011; Kupika et al., 2025), is essential for developing locally relevant, culturally appropriate, and climate-adaptive policies.

In summary, the indigenous knowledge of Garmsar County constitutes a coherent and multifunctional framework for sustainability, integrating ecological, social, and cultural dimensions. It offers invaluable, place-based insights for addressing contemporary challenges of desertification, natural resource management, and rural livelihood resilience. Therefore, systematically recognizing, documenting, and mainstreaming this knowledge is imperative. It serves not as a replacement for, but as a vital complement to scientific expertise, and it holds significant potential to inform future policies for desert conservation, climate adaptation, and sustainable development.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Environmental Resilience
  • Natural Resource Management
  • Local Development
  • Climate Change Adaptation
  • Conservation
  1. Abdou Kandal, H.A.H. (2020). Desert Related Traditional Knowledge, Policies and Management in Wadi Allaqi, South Eastern Desert, Egypt. [Thesis fully internal (DIV), University of Groningen]. University of Groningen. https://doi.org/10.33612/diss.149297572

    1. Afrakhteh, H., & Shah Hosseini, A. (2017). Creativity of the Sangsari nomads in adapting to the environment. Iranian Journal of Indigenous Knowledge, 4(7), 1-3, (In Persian).
    2. Baraabadi, H., Zehtabian, G., Tavili, A., Dadresi Sabzevar, A., & Khosravi, H. (2013). The impact of floodwater spreading on the success of shrub planting and desertification control. Desert Management, (1), 1-12, (In Persian).
    3. Batooli, H. (2019). Environmental hazards facing indigenous knowledge in desert sand areas. Nature of Iran, 4(2), 15-21, (In Persian).
    4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101
    5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Supporting best practice in reflexive thematic analysis reporting in Palliative Medicine: A review of published research and introduction to the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines (RTARG). Palliative medicine, 38(6), 608-616.‏
    6. Davis, A., K. & Ruddle, A. (2015). Constructing confidence rational skepticism and systematic enquiry in local ecological knowledge. Ecological Applications, 20(3), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1890/09-0422.1
    7. Dehvari, S., Faraji, M., Cheraghian, A., & Ghorbani, M. (2017). Investigation of rural women’s indigenous knowledge in livestock production and management: Imamzadeh Saleh village. Marta, 11(3), 306-320, (In Persian).
    8. Fouladi, E., Armaghan, S., Daniali, T., & Hemmati, M. (2021). Analysis of effective criteria on the future status of rural indigenous knowledge in the viability of rural areas. Village and Sustainable Spatial Development, 2(3), 19-44, (In Persian).
    9. Hojjat-Faroush Nia, Sh., & Borhani, M. (2021). Identifying suitable areas for desertification control operations: A prerequisite for the success of wind erosion control projects. Arid Region, 11(2), 109–115, (In Persian).
    10. Hosseini, S. Y., Mani, A., & Mohsenifard, M. (2025). A qualitative approach to meta-knowledge in public sector management based on thematic analysis method. Sustainable Human Resource Management, 7(12), 185-204, (In Persian).
    11. Jamal Abdullah, H., & Targaki, H. (2015). The use of Indigenous Knowledge in Agriculture and its Role in Sustainable Development. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), vol. 4, pp. 1312-1317.
    12. Jomehpour, M. (2015). Localization in the field of rural development and the role of indigenous knowledge in its process. Iranian Journal of Indigenous Knowledge, 1(2), 50-79, (In Persian).
    13. Kohasaka. R., & Rogel, M. (2019). Traditional and Local Knowledge for Sustainable Development: Empowering the Indigenous and Local Communities of the World, Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals ((ENUNSDG)), Springer Nature Link: 1261–1273
    14. Khosroshahi, M. (2017). The intensification and threat of desertification in Iran from a water perspective. Nature of Iran, 2(2), 6–13, (In Persian).
    15. Kom, Z., & Nethengwe, N. S. (2024). Indigenous and Local Knowledge: Instruments Towards Achieving SDG2: A Review in an African Context. Sustainability, 16(20), 9137.‏
    16. Kupika, O.L., Chanyandura, A., Chinomona, R., & Petros Mwera, P. (2025). Local ecological knowledge on the impacts of climate change and variability on riparian-based ecosystem services in semi-arid parts of Zimbabwe. Scientific African, vol. 27, e02513, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02513
    17. McCullough, E. B., & Matson, P. A. (2011). Evolution of the knowledge system for agricultural development in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4609-4614. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011602108
    18. Nezhadi, F., Abbasi, E., & Chobchian, S. (2016). The role of desertification projects in increasing social capital of local people: Case study of the carbon sequestration project in Shahdad. Rural Studies, 7(4), 604-617, (In Persian).
    19. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.‏
    20. Parsons, M., Nalau, J., Fisher, K. (2017). Alternative Perspectives on Sustainability: Indigenous Knowledge and Methodologies. Challenges in Sustainability, 5(1), 7-14, DOI: 10.12924/cis2017.05010007
    21. Pretty, J., Toulmin, C., & Williams, S. (2011). Sustainable intensification in African agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 9(1), 5-24.
    22. Sadeghi-Ravesh, M. H., & Khosravi, H. (2014). Evaluation of desertification strategies using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) model: A case study of Khezrabad region, Yazd. Environmental Science and Technology, 16(2), 87-99, (In Persian).
    23. Sadeghi-Ravesh, M. H. (2018). Analysis of desertification strategies derived from decision-making models using B&C social welfare function. Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 7(18), 37-51, (In Persian).
    24. Sadeghi-Ravesh, M. H., & Jabalbarzi, B. (2019). Ranking desertification control strategies using Multi-Attribute Utility Theory (MAUT). Environmental Science and Technology, 21(8), 101-115, (In Persian).
    25. Salehi, A., & Karbasi, P. (2021). The role of anthropogenic factors in desertification of eastern Isfahan. Spatial Planning, 11(3), 1–24, (In Persian).
    26. Scientific Advisory Board. (2016). Indigenous and local knowledge(s) and science(s) for sustainable development: policy brief by the Scientific Advisory Board of the UN Secretary-General. Document code: SC/2016/UNSAB/ILK, Hosted by United Nation Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    27. Shahraki, A. S., Panagopoulos, T., Ashari, H. E., & Bazrafshan, O. (2023). Relationship between indigenous knowledge development in agriculture and the sustainability of water resources. Sustainability, 15(7), 5665.‏
    28. Simpson, L. B. (2014). Land as pedagogy: Nishnaabeg intelligence and rebellious transformation. Decolonization: Indigeneity. Education & Society, 3(3), 1-25.   https://jps.library.utoronto.ca/index.php/des/article/view/22170 
    29. Tabatabaei, S. M., & Khazimehnejad, H. (2019). Investigating the role of indigenous knowledge of qanats and related hydraulic structures on social and cultural dimensions of sustainable development. In National Conference on Qanat, Enduring Heritage and Water: 1-13, (In Persian).
    30. Terry, G., Hayfield, N., Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 2(17-37), 25.‏
    31. Thompson, K., Lantz, T.C., & Corinna Ban, N. (2020). A review of Indigenous knowledge and participation in environmental monitoring. Ecology and Society, 25(2), 1-16.
    32. Williams, P.A., Sikutshwa, L., & Sheona Shackleton, S. (2020). Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches—Lessons from a Systematic Review. LAND, 9(9), 331; https://doi.org/10.3390/land9090331
    33. Xiao, C., Zaehle, S., Yang, H., Wigneron, J. P., Schmullius, C., & Bastos, A. (2023). Land cover and management effects on ecosystem resistance to drought stress. Earth System Dynamics, 14(6), 1211-1237.‏
    34. Zamen Rahimi Ardakani, A., Esmaeilpour, Y., Mohammadi, Y., & Gholami, H. (2018). Factor analysis of barriers to local communities’ participation in bio-rehabilitation and desertification control projects: Carbon sequestration project in Lapui region, Zarqan, Fars Province. Watershed Management Research, 31(2), 27–40, (In Persian).
    35. Zhou, G., Yao, J., Chen, J., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Mo, Y., ... & Zheng, P. (2024). Characteristics of Drought Events and Their Impact on Vegetation Dynamics in the Arid Region of Northwest China. Forests, 15(12), 2187.‏