ارزیابی کیفیت منابع آب زیرزمینی دشت بروجرد-دورود و تأثیر آن بر نفوذپذیری خاک‌های زراعی با تحلیل‌های آماری و زمین‌آمار

نویسنده

گروه مهندسی آب،دانشکده کشاورزی،دانشگاه لرستان

10.22052/deej.2018.7.25.11

چکیده

منابع آب زیرزمینی بزرگ‌ترین ذخیرۀ قابل‌دسترس آب شیرین زمین هستند که مدیریت و کنترل کیفی آن‌ها موضوعی اساسی است. هدف از این تحقیق، بررسی کیفی آب زیرزمینی از نظر مصارف کشاورزی و تأثیر آن بر نفوذپذیری در دشت بروجرد- دورود است. بدین منظور روند تغییرات پارامترهای هدایت الکتریکی، نسبت جذبی سدیم، کلسیم، منیزیم، سدیم و بی‌کربنات منابع دشت در بازۀ زمانی 1372ـ۱۳۹۵ با آزمون من-کندال بررسی و برای تهیۀ نقشه‌های کیفی بر اساس شاخص‌های تراوایی، درصد سدیم و ویلکاکس از 41 منبع آب زیرزمینی در سال‌ 1395 استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که روند تغییرات همۀ پارامترها کاهشی بوده و روند تغییرات بی‌کربنات در سطح اطمینان 95درصد معنی‌دار بوده است. در طبقه‌بندی کشاورزی بر اساس شاخص تراوایی 84/85درصد از دشت دارای کیفیت عالی برای آبیاری، از نظر درصد سدیم قسمت مرکزی دشت کیفیت پایین‌تر از سایر نواحی داشته و بر اساس طبقه‌بندی ویلکاکس حدود 94/85درصد وسعت دشت دارای کیفیت مناسب است. بررسی تأثیر تغییرات EC و SAR بر نفوذپذیری خاک نشان داد که تغییرات این دو پارامتر در سراسر دشت منفی نیست و منطقه دارای وضعیت نفوذپذیری خوب و متوسط است که 8/26درصد در ردۀ خوب قرار داشته و منطقه‌ای در طبقۀ نفوذپذیری بد قرار ندارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of Groundwater Resources Quality and Its Effect on soil permeability in Borujerd-Doroud Plain Using statistical and geostatistical analysis

نویسنده [English]

  • Yaser Sabzevari
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Considering the increasing population and the growing need for food and drinking water, it is essential to explore and understand the factors of crop production, especially water resources. Today, the removal of undiluted water from underground water sources has produced qualitative issues, in addition to a few shortcomings. These issues are more significant in arid and semi-arid regions, which are more dependent on these resources. In these areas, due to lack of water resources, access to appropriate quality resources is important. The quality of groundwater undergoes spatial and temporal scales and cannot be assumed to be constant over time and place. Therefore, for the purpose of using groundwater resources and targeting for future uses, it is important to consider changes in the quality characteristics of resources over time and place. Therefore, studying the temporal and spatial variations of water quality is essential for properly and efficiently managing the use of these resources. In order to determine the process of time variation, different methods are used. One of the most common non-parametric methods is analysis of the trend in time series using the Mann-Kendall test. It is necessary to know the spatial changes of resources, to collect parameters in different locations, which requires a high cost and time. In such a situation, geospatial interpolation methods can be very efficient. Land use methods can reduce costs and increase the accuracy of estimation, due to the ability of reducing the number of samplings, application of the combination and providing more accurate estimation of variables location. The purpose of this research is investigation of groundwater quality in terms of agricultural use and its effect on permeability in Borujerd-Doroud Plain.
 
Materials and methods: Boroujerd-Doroud Plain with an area of ​​2545.8 km2 is located in northeast of Lorestan province and northernmost part the large Karon Basin. the trend of changes in the parameters of electrical conductivity, calcium, magnesium, sodium and bicarbonate of plain resources during the period of time (1994-2016) was investigated by the Mann-Kendall test and for qualitative maps prepation based on the Permeability Index, Sodium Percentage, and Wilcox, the data of 41 groundwater resources in 2016 were used. The accuracy evaluation of any interpolation or selection of the appropriate parameter is necessary. In the present study, the RMSE index was used to determine the appropriate method. Among different methods, each one with less RMSE is selected as the appropriate method. Different methods of interpolation were compared for the zoning of the quality parameters. Regarding the results of this comparison, the conventional Kriging interpolation method was chosen as the most appropriate interpolation method due to lower RMSE. The permeability index is a parameter that is used to evaluate the quality of irrigation water. Sodium levels of water are important parameters for using water in irrigated agricultural land. Increasing of sodium in water decreases soil permeability. Wilcox classification is one of the most important classifications for determining the quality of agricultural water based on two parameters of electrical conductivity and sodium absorption ratio as alkalinity risk.
 
Result: The results showed that the trend of changes in all parameters was reduced, which showed that the trend of changes in bicarbonate content was significant at 95% confidence level. In terms of permeability index, 85.84% of the plain has excellent irrigation water quality. Based on this classification, the water quality in northwest of the plain is poor, in southeast is moderate and in other plain areas is excellent for irrigation purposes. Based on the qualitative map of the percent of sodium, the irrigation water quality in northwest and southeast of the plain is excellent, and in the central area of the plain is allowable. The irrigation water quality in other areas of plain is good. The irrigation water quality based on Wilcox's method was classified in two C2S1 and C3S1 classes, which included 90.91% of the studied sources of C2S1 and 9.09% of the C3S1 grade.
 
Discussion and Conclusion: The quality map based on this classification showed that 85.94% of the plain area has a good water quality. The Investigation of EC and SAR changes effects on soil permeability showed that the variations of these two parameters are not negative across the plain, and the region has a good and moderate permeability status, which is 26.8%.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Groundwater
  • Kriging
  • Mann-Kendal
  • permeability
  • Water Quality
1. Abbasnia, A., Radfard, M., Mahvi, A. H., Nabizadeh, R., Yousefi, M., Soleimani, H., & Alimohammadi, M., 2018. Groundwater quality assessment for irrigation purposes based on irrigation water quality index and its zoning with GIS in the villages of Chabahar, Sistan and Baluchistan, Iran. Data in brief 19, 623-631. 2. Ahmadi, S. H., & Sedghamiz, A. 2008. Application and evaluation of kriging and cokriging methods on groundwater depth mapping. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 138, 357-368. 3. Ahmed, S. 2002. Groundwater monitoring network design: application of geostatistics with a few case studies from a granitic aquifer in a semi – arid region. J. American Journal 67, 1564–1571. 4. Ayers, R. S., Tanji, K. 1981. An application from Ayers and Westcot's 1985" Use of treated municipal wastewaters for irrigation. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29. 5. Baalousha, H. 2010. Assessment of a groundwater quality monitoring network using vulnerability mapping and geostatistics: a case study from Heretaunga Plains, New Zealand. Agricultural water management 97, 240-246. ‎6.‎ Dadrasi sabzevar, A. 2006. Quantitative and qualitative changes of groundwater ‎resources and its role in destruction of land. The first regional conference on optimal ‎utilization of water sources in Karoon and Zayandehrood, Shahrekord University. ‎September 14th-15th, 2006. ‎[Persian]‎ 7. Delbari, M., Afrasiab, p., salary, m. 2013. The zonation of qualitative parameters (salinity and sodium) of water using statistical pit methods Case study: Kerman plain, Journal of Water Resources Engineering, Sixth Year, Spring 2013, 24-11. 8. Doneen, L. D. 1964. Notes on water quality in agriculture. Department of Water Science and Engineering, University of California, Davis. 9. Doonen, L. D. 1962. The influence of crop and soil on percolating waters. In Proceeding of 1961 Biennial Conference on Groundwater Recharge. 10. Goovaerts, P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford Univ. Press, New York. 11. Houben, G., Tünnermeier, T., Eqrar, N., Himmelsbach, T. 2009. Hydrogeology of the Kabul Basin (Afghanistan), part II: groundwater geochemistry. Hydrogeology journal 17, 935-948. 12. Ibrahim, A.A. 2002. Irrigation water quality evaluation of IA-Hassa springers and its predictive effects on soil properties. Pkistan Journal of Biologocal sciences. Vol.5,No. 6, PP.651-655. 13. Journel, A.G., C.J. Huijbregts. 1978. Mining geostatistics. Academic Press. New York. 600 p. 14. Latif, M., Mousavi, S., Ofyuni, M., Velayati, S. 2005. Investigation of Nitrate Contamination and its Origin in Groundwater of Mashhad Plain, journal of Agricultural Science and Natural Resources 12, 21-32. [Persian] 15. Malkutian, M. Wow. Worms 2005. Change in chemical quality of groundwater resources in the Bravoat and Bam Plain. Hormozgan Medical Journal, Second Year 8, 109-116. [Persian] 16. Manjusree, T. M. Joseph, S. Thomas, J. 2009. Hydrogeochemistry and Groundwater Quality in the Coastal Sandy Clay Aquifers of Alappuzha District, Kerala, Journal geological society of india 74, 459-468. 17. Mozafarizadeh J. 2006. "Investigating the effect of geology formations on the groundwater quality" -1St Conference Environment Geology Tehran. [Persian] 18. Nath, V.R. and Helen, H.M. 2013. Evaluation of ground water quality in Neyyattinkara Taluk, Kerala. Journal of Chemical & Pharmaceutical Research, 5(4). 19. Nazarizadeh, F., Ershadian, B., ZandVakili, K., Nouriemamzade'i, M. 2006. Investigating the variations in groundwater quality in Balarood plain in Khuzestan province originally published as an ASCE 1981 Water Forum Conference Proceedings. [Persian] 20. Pasquini, A. I., Lecomte, K. L., Piovano, E. L., Depetris, P. J. 2006. Recent rainfall and runoff variability in central Argentina. Quaternary International 158, 127-139. 21. Rafi Sharif-Abad, J., Noahhegar, A., Zahtabian, Gh.R. and Gholami, H. 2013. Investigating temporal and spatial variations of groundwater quality for drinking and farming in Ardakan plain of Yazd. - Desertification Management Research 9, 119-107. [Persian] 22. Rahmani, A.Shokoohi, R. 2007. Evaluation of groundwater quality in Hamedan plain, Tenth National Conference on Environmental Health. 2009-2298. [Persian] 23. Rahman-Salari, K. And hope, sh. 2016. Study of the efficiency of statistical methods (Kriging and IDW) in preparing the Fertility Map of Kamaland plain of Khorramabad. International Conference on Architecture, Urbanism, Civil Engineering and the Environment. [Persian] 24. Richards, L. A. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils 78, 154. 25. Shakerian, N., Zehtabian, G. R., Azarnivand, H., & Khosravi, H. 2011. Evaluation of desertification intensity based on soil and water criteria in Jarghooyeh region. Desert 16, 23-32. 26. Valdes, D., Dupont, J.P., Laignel, B., Ogier, S., Leboulanger, T. and Mahler, B.J. 2007. A spatial analysis of structural controls on Karst groundwater geochemistry at a regional scale. Journal of hydrology, 340(3-4), pp.244-255. 27. Wahlin, K., & Grimvall, A. 2010. Roadmap for assessing regional trends in groundwater quality. Environmental monitoring and assessment 165, 217-231. 28. Wilcox, L. 1955. Classification and use of irrigation waters. 29. World Health Organization. 1989. Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture and aquaculture: report of a WHO scientific group [meeting held in Geneva from 18 to 23 November 1987]. 30. Zehtabian, G., Khosravi, H., Ghodsi, M. 2010. High demand in a land of water scarcity: Iran. In Water and Sustainability in Arid Regions. 75-86.