شبیه سازی اثر تغییر اقلیم بر افت سطح آب‌های زیرزمینی دشت کرمان با استفاده از مدل GMS

نویسندگان

گروه مهندسی آب دانشگاه اراک

10.22052/deej.2020.9.26.25

چکیده

پدیدۀ تغییر اقلیم از جمله مواردی است که تأثیر بسزایی در کاهش سطح آب رودخانه‌ها و تغذیه سفره‌های آب زیرزمینی به‌ویژه طی سال‌های اخیر داشته است. در این راستا مدل‌های مختلفی به پیش‌بینی دما و بارش تحت‌تأثیر اقلیم حاضر و آینده می‌پردازند. این مقادیر پیش‌بینی‌شده، توسط مدل‌های متنوع، رفتار آبخوان طی سناریوهای گوناگون (تعریف‌شده توسط گزارش‌های IPCC) را شبیه‌سازی می‌کنند. هدف از این مطالعه، مدل‌سازی جریان آب زیرزمینی دشت کرمان با استفاده از مدل GMS تحت‌تأثیر تغییر اقلیم برای دورۀ آتی (2030) می‌باشد. بدین منظور از مدل LARS و سناریوهای مطرح A1B، B1 و A2 (حالت‌های بینابینی، خوشبینانه و بدبینانه) برای بررسی تغییر اقلیم استفاده شد. در ابتدا، نتایج حاصل از ریزمقیاس نمایی نشان‌دهندۀ افزایش دمای حداقل بین 59/0 تا 86/0 درجۀ سانتی‌گراد و افزایش دمای حداکثر بین 56/0 تا 85/0 درجۀ سانتی‌گراد نسبت به دورۀ پایه است. مقایسۀ بارش سالیانۀ درازمدت نشان می‎دهد که کمترین مقدار بارش طی سناریوB1  در دورۀ 2011 تا 2030 اتفاق خواهد افتاد که معادل 02/10 میلی‌متر بیشتر از بارش دورۀ پایه خواهد بود. این در حالی است که بیشترین مقدار بارش با افزایش 80/15 میلی‌متری در دورۀ 2011 تا 2030 طی سناریو A2 اتفاق خواهد افتاد. در ادامه، مقادیر RMSE، MAE و ME بعد از واسنجی (به‌ترتیب برابر 38/0 متر، 21/0 متر و 20/0- متر) نشانگر دقت قابل قبول مدل GMS در این منطقه است. بعد از ارائۀ عملکرد مناسب مدل GMS، برای شبیه‌سازی اثر تغییر اقلیم بر تراز سطح ایستابی، از چهار سناریوی مختلف برداشت از آبخوان، استفاده شد و تغییرات افت آبخوان نسبت به دورۀ پایه بررسی شد. نتایج حاکی از افت شدید تراز آب زیرزمینی در دوره‌های آتی می‌باشد؛ به‌گونه‌ای که افت سطح آب مطابق سناریو اول معادل 06/10- (سال 2030) خواهد بود. از طرفی، مقادیر افت سطح آب طی سناریوهای تغییر اقلیم A2،A1B  و B1 به‌ترتیب برای سناریو دوم 9/11-، 32/12- و 52/16-متر، سناریو سوم 41/16-، 66/16- و 30/17- متر و در نهایت برای سناریو چهارم 65/16-، 90/16- و17/18- متر خواهد بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Investigating Climate Change Effects on Groundwater-Level Decline in Kerman Plain via GMS Model

نویسندگان [English]

  • Asma Rastegar
  • Shahla Paimozd
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Groundwater is considered as one of the main resources for drinking water, agriculture and industry. While groundwater is taken as a reserve resource in some areas, in other areas it may be used for supplying potable water due to their easy availability. Moreover, groundwater analysis is an essential factor in maintaining its access. In fact, modeling and predicting the groundwater level play a significant role in preserving the environment, maintaining the balance of the groundwater system, controlling changes in groundwater levels and preventing the escalation of land subsidence. On the other hand, climate change and the decline in groundwater table have been proved to be one of the main causes of land degradation in the past decades. According to Iranian Ministry of Energy, about 7 billion cubic meters of groundwater reservoirs are declining annually. Also, from among 609 plains in Iran, approximately 350 of them are known as the forbidden ones. The increasing number of prohibited plains from 15 wells in 1968 to 199 ones in 2001, and rising the dried plains into 350 ones in 2015 indicate the inappropriate status of water resources in Iran. Meanwhile, the highest amount of water scarcity in underground reservoirs belongs to the second grade Salt Lake as well as the Kerman Plain which has attracted more attentions in recent years as one of the most important plains of this area due to the large decline in its groundwater.
 
Materials and methods: This study set out to model the flow of groundwater in the Kerman plain aquifer under the influence of climate change for the upcoming period, using the GMS model. To this end, HADCM3 model, LARS model and A1B, B1 and A2 scenarios were applied for the investigation of the effects of climate change on aquifer volume and groundwater declines. Finally, having applied four different scenarios, the performance of each management options and the effects of different climate scenarios on the decline of the aquifer were examined.
 


The results of the exponential microscopy indicated a minimum increase in the temperature between 0.59 to 0.86 degrees Celsius and a maximum temperature increase of between 0.56 to 0.85 degrees Celsius. The reported increase in minimum and maximum temperature in the upcoming period is consistent with the results of the studies carried out by Zhang and Nyinger (2005), Mosheh Boani and Merid (2006), Khorshid Doost and Ghavidel Rahimi (2006), Kukchi et al (2006), Yano et al. (2007), and Babayan et al. (2009), where temperature increases have been predicted.


Comparison of long-term annual precipitations suggested prospective increase in the rainfall which is consistent with the results of the study conducted by Steel Dani et al. (2008). Moreover, according to the findings of the current study, the lowest amount of precipitation in scenario B1 would occur from 2011 to 2030, which is 10.22 mm more than the base period rainfall. This is while the highest rainfall was expected to occur with a rise of 80/15 mm within the time period of 2011-2030 in scenario A2. As found by the simulation of the groundwater model (GMS), there was an acceptable accuracy for simulating the aquifer of Kerman Plain. In terms of Kerman aquifer quantity, the results suggested, after a steady-state calibration, that RMSE, MAE and ME values were 0.38 m, 0.21 m, and 0.20 m, respectively, showing acceptable accuracy of modeling in the mode was lasting. Having set the proper performance of GMS model, four different scenarios were used to simulate the effect of climate change on the station's level, and its changes were compared with the base period. On the other hand, the decline in water level would be 10.6 -10 in the first scenario. The levels of water decline within climate change scenarios A2, A1B and B1 for were 11.9, 12.36 and 16.22 for the second scenario, 16.41, 16.66 and 17.30 for the third scenario, and 16.65, 16.9 and 18.15 meters for the fourth scenario respectively.
 
Discussion & conclusion: Although climate change directly affects surface water resources changes in major long-term variables such as rainfall, temperature, evapotranspiration and transpiration, it is difficult to determine the relationship between climate change variables and underground water. This study, therefore, attempted to predict the relationship between climate and groundwater levels for the upcoming period. Comparison of long-term annual precipitation indicate in increase in precipitation which is consistent with the results found by Steel Dani et al. (2008). According to the findings of the current study, the calibrated model has acceptable accuracy and the mathematical model can simulate the normal conditions governing the aquifer of Kerman Plain. Having obtained the proper performance of GMS model, four different scenarios were used to simulate the effect of climate change on the station's level, and its changes were compared with the base period. The results showed that an 18-meter water decline would not be expected in such a situation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Climate change
  • GMS Model
  • Groundwater
  • Kerman Plain
1. Abdar Esfahani, S., Kalantari, N. and Mohammadi Ahmad Abadi, R., 2014. Survey of Recent Drought on Groundwater Resources of Sharif Abad, Qom. Proceedings of the Conference on Water Challenges and Crises in the Salt Lake Basin. Chamber of Commerce of Industries and Mines of Qom Province. 2. Babaei, O., Ghasemi, E. and Fatahi, E., 2014. Investigating the Impact of Climate Change on the Trend of Iran Land Limit Rainfall Profiles. Journal of Spatial Analysis of Environmental Hazards, 3: 85-103. 3. Babaian, A. and Najafi Nik, Z., 2007. Assessment of LARS-WG model for modeling of meterological parameters in khorasan province in 1961-2003, Nivar Magazine, 63: 24-30. 4. Babaian, A., Najafi Nik, Z., Zabol Abbasi, F., Nowkhandan, M. and Malbosi, Sh., 2009. Assessment of climate changing in 2010-2039 using downscaling data GCM (ECHO-G), Geograph and Dev. J. 16: 34-41. 5. Bromand, S., Fatemi Nia, F. and Hoseini, M., 2014. Estimating the Future Climate Change in Isfahan Province Using BCM2 and HADCM3 Models in LARS-WG Refractive Environment, Geographical studies of arid regions, 16: 55-71. 6. Eftekhari, B., 2010. Simulation of groundwater resources of Qom plain using a finite difference mathematical model. Master's thesis, Faculty of Earth Sciences, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz. 7. Hasheni Nasab, F.A., Mosavi baygi, M., Bakhtiari, B. and Davari, K., 2013. Forecast for the next 20 years by using downscaling changes in rainfall and General Circulation Model (Case Study Mashhad and Kerman station). The first national conference on water and weather. Kerman 8. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Task Group on Scenarios for Climate Impact Assessment. IPCC. 2007. 9. IPCC. Summary for policymakers in climate change.The physical science basis contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change Cambridge university press. Cambridge. United Kingdom and New York. NY, USA.2013:1-33. 10. Khorshiddoust, A.M. and Ghavidel Rahimi, Y., 2006. Simulate the effects of a doubling of atmospheric carbon dioxide on climate change Tabriz, Journal of Environmental Studies, 39: 1-10. 11. Kochaki, A.M., Nassiri, G.A., Kamali, A. and Shahandeh, H., 2006. "Potential impacts of climate change on agrometeorological indicators in Iran". Arid Land Research and Management. 20: 245-259. 12. Mani, A., T.C.Tsai, F., Kao, S., Naz, B., Ashfaq, M. and Rastogi, D. 2016. Conjunctive management of surface and groundwater resources under projected future climate change scenarios. Journal of Hydrology 540: 397-411. 13. Massah Bavani, A.R. and Morid, S., 2006. Impact of climate change on the water resources of zayandeh rud basin, J. Sci. and Technol. Agric. and Natur. Resour. 9: 4. 28-34. 14. Mazadeh, J., 2013. Quantitative modeling of groundwater using GMS software in Quchan plain. Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. 15. McDonald, M.G. and Harbaugh, A.W., 1998. A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model: U.S. geological survey techniques of water resources investigations, book 6, chap. A1, 586 p. 16. Mesmarian, A., MasahBavani, A. and Javadi, S., 2016. Impact of Climate Change on Shahrekord Plain Subterranean Wastewater in Future. Eco Hydrology.vol 2. Pp. 233-242. 17. Report on water resources and consumption. 2011. Ministry of Energy. 18. Richardson, C.W. and Wright, D.A., 1984. WGEN: a model for generating daily weather variables. Report No. ARS8, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 19. Sapriza-Azuri Gonzalo, Jódar Jorge, Carrera Jesús and Gupta, Hoshin V., 2015. Toward a comprehensive assessment of the combined impacts of climate change and groundwater pumping on catchment dynamics. Journal of Hydrology. 529: 1701–1712. 20. Semenov M.A. and Stratonovitch, P., 2010. Use of multi-model ensembles from global climate models for assessment of climate change impacts. Climate Research, 41: 1-14. 21. Shokouhi, F., Abdelahi, A., Majidi, A., Yaghoubi, B. and Bakhshi Pour Azar, A., 2013. Modeling Groundwater Flow in Tuyserkan Plain Using GMS Mathematical Model, First National Conference on Architecture, Civil and Environmental Environment, Hamedan, Hegmataneh Environmental Assessors Association. 22. Shrestha, S., Viet, B. and Prasad, P., 2016. Climate change impacts on groundwater resources in Mekong Delta under representative concentration pathways (RCPs) scenarios. Environmental Science & Policy 61: 1–13 23. Water Balance Update Studies of Kerman Study Area, 2010. 24. Yano, T., Aydin, M. and Haraguchi, T., 2007. "Impact of Climate change on Irrigation Demand and Crop Growth in a Mediterranean Environment of Turkey", J. Sensors, 7, 2297-2315. 25. Yoshioka, Y., Nakamura, K., Horino, H. and Kawashima, S., 2016. Numerical assessments of the impacts of climate change on regional groundwater systems in a paddy-dominated alluvial 26. Ziaee, N., Ownegh, M., Asgari, H.R., Massah Bavani, A., Salman Mahini, A. and Hosseinalizadeh, M., 2017. Comparison of climate change scenarios on the desertification hazard intensity and risk of Hablehroud basin, Tehran province. Journal of Desert Ecosystem Engineering Research.16:105-118. 27. Zhang, X.C. and Nearing, M.A., 2005. Impact of climate change on soil erosion, runoff and wheat productivity in central Oklahama, Catena, 61: PP.185-195.