مقایسۀ روش‌های تجربی برآورد تبخیر و تعرق براساس داده‌های لایسی‌متری (مطالعۀ موردی: دشت کاشان)

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده علوم و فنون، دانشگاه تهران

2 گروه مرتع و آبخیزداری، دانشکده منابع طبیعی و علوم زمین، دانشگاه کاشان

3 دانشکده مهندسی آب و خاک، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی گرگان

10.22052/deej.2020.9.27.45

چکیده

برآورد تبخیر و تعرق در سطح منطقه‌ای، یکی از مؤلفه‌های مهم برای مدیریت بهینۀ منابع آب است. روش‌های تجربی زیادی برای برآورد تبخیر و تعرق گیاه مرجع وجود دارد، ولی این روش‌ها نتایج یکسانی برای همۀ مناطق نشان نمی‌دهند. مطالعات لایسی‌متری به‌‌منظور تعیین مناسب‌ترین روش در هر منطقه به کار می‌رود. لذا در این تحقیق برای تعیین مناسب‌ترین روش برآورد تبخیر و تعرق در منطقۀ مورد مطالعه، آزمایشی به‌مدت 6 ماه در سال آماری 1391ـ۱۳۹۲ با استفاده از 4 دستگاه لایسی‌متر زهکش‌دار در دانشگاه کاشان اجرا شد. همچنین انواع روش‌های تجربی برآورد تبخیر و تعرق و تشتک تبخیر بر اساس داده‌های لایسی‌متری مورد مقایسه قرار گرفتند. در نهایت، نتایج برآورد مجموع تبخیر و تعرق ماهانه با استفاده از لایسی‌متر در منطقۀ طرح در ماه‌های دی، بهمن، اسفند، فروردین، اردیبهشت و خرداد به‌ترتیب برابر 49/24، 39/38، 52/51، 87/73، 77/119 و 180 میلی‌متر به دست آمد. همچنین از میان روش‌های مورد بررسی، روش تورنت‌وایت به‌ترتیب با 2R، R، NSC، RMSE و MBE برابر 95/0، 97/0،  986/0،  29/4 و 15/1- از دقت بیشتری برخوردار بود که به‌عنوان مناسب‌ترین روش برآورد تبخیر و تعرق در منطقۀ مورد مطالعه معرفی می‌شود. پس از آن، روش‌های جنسن- هیز اصلاح‌شده، بلانی‌-کریدل، جنسن‌- هیز، هارگریوز- سامانی، تشتک تبخیر و فائو- پنمن- مانتیث در رتبه‌های بعدی قرار می‌گیرند. در نهایت روش پنمن با 2R برابر 58/0 کمترین دقت را داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparing Empirical Methods in Evapotranspiration Estimation based on Lysimeter Data: A Case Study of Kashan plain

نویسندگان [English]

  • Seyedjavad Sadatinezhad 1
  • leila Nazari 2
  • Hoda Ghasemiyeh 2
  • Salman Arefkhane kalate 3
1
2
3
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Estimation of evapotranspiration at a regional level is an important element in efficient management of water resources. Evapotranspiration includes the evaporation from the surface of soil and water and also, the transpiration by the plant that is very important in arid and semi-arid areas. There are many empirical methods for evapotranspiration estimation of reference plants, but these methods don't produce the same results for all areas. Lysimeter studies are carried out to determine the most suitable method in each area.
 
Material and Methods: The study area in this research is located in Kashan University, based in the center of Kashan plain with geographical coordinates of ° 45 ′21 ° 51 east longitude and ″ 18 ′00 ° 34 northern latitudes. Then, to measure the evapotranspiration of the reference grass plant, three drained lysimeters of the grass plant and one control lysimeter were made and used in the research site for 6 months within the statistical year of 2012-2013. Moreover, empirical methods of evapotranspiration estimation and evaporation pan were compared based on lysimeter data.
 
Results: Using lysimeter in the project area, the estimation results for monthly evapotranspiration were reported as being 24.49, 38.39, 51.52, 73.87, 119.77, and 180 mm in January, February, March, April, May, and June, respectively. Moreover, from among the methods investigated, Thornthwaite turned out to be the most accurate ones with R2 = 0.95, R=0.97, NSC= 0.986, RMSE=4.29, and MBE= -1.15, being considered as the most suitable method for evapotranspiration estimation in the study area. After that, modified Jensen Hayes, Blaney –Criddle, Jensen-Hayes, Hargreaves-Samani, evaporation pan, and FA0-Penman-Monteith were considered as other useful methods in that regard though with lower accuracy. Finally, the Penman method with R2 = 0.58 was found to have the least accuracy from among the relevant methods considered.
 
Discussion and Conclusion: Kashan is one of Iran’s arid regions which faced a severe shortage of water resources. Therefore, careful planning and efficient management of water resources is required to avoid any serious problem in providing water for different purposes. The evapotranspiration parameter is considered as an important criterion in determining the extent of drought in different areas. Experimental methods for estimating evapotranspiration including the Penman and FAO-Penman-Monteith require many meteorological parameters. Penman method has been introduced for humid climates of England and is not suitable for the arid and semi-arid conditions of Kashan. As it considers a large number of climatic parameters in its calculation of evapotranspiration, this method has acceptable accuracy, but as all the required information is not calculated, it cannot provide a good estimate. In this study, the appropriate evapotranspiration method for the Kashan region was obtained, using the data gathered over six months in the statistical year of 2012-2013. Therefore, to ensure the accuracy of the results obtained, it is recommended that this research continues for at least the next two or three years. On the other hand, due to a possible error in the drainage lysimeter when calculating the actual evapotranspiration, it is recommended that the research get conducted in the region via accurate weight lysimeters so that it could identify the most appropriate method of estimating evapotranspiration in Kashan more accurately.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Evaporation pan
  • Experimental methods
  • Thornthwaite
  • Grass reference plant
  • Drainage lysimeter
1. Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S. Raes, D. and Smith, M., 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements, FAO Irrigation and Drainage, No. 56. FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 300. 2. Allen, R.G., and Pruitt, W.O., 1991. FAO-24 Reference Evapotranspiration Factors. J. Irrig and Drain, ASCE 117 (5), 758-773. 3. Alizadeh, A., Khanjani, M.C. Teraz, H. and Rahnamoud, MR., 2006. Investigating correction effects of temperature data on calculation accuracy of the evapotranspiration and its comparison with the results obtained from weighing lysimeter, Journal of Geography and Regional Development Research, 19(2), 97-105. 4. Alizadeh, A. and Kamali, Gh., 2007. Water requirements of plants, 1th Edition, Astan Quds Razavi Press, first edition, pp. 228. 5. Alizadeh, 2013. Principles of applied hydrology, Astan Quds Razavi, Imam-Reza University Press, 928 p. 6. AL-Omran, F.S., Mohammad, H.M. AL-Ghobar and Alazba, A., 2004. Determination of transpiration of tomato and squash using lysimeters in central Saudi-Arabia, International Agricultural Engineering Journal, 182 (13), 27-36. 7. Biglouei, M.H. and Maghsoudi, A., 2004. Determining the most appropriate method for estimating reference crop evapotranspiration for the Rasht region. Proceedings of 8th National Conference on Irrigation and Evaporation Reduction, pp. 34-43. 8. Carvalho, D.F., Silva, L.D.B. Guerra, J.C.M Gruz, F.A. and Souza, A.P., 2007. Installation, calibration and operation of a weighing lysimeter. Eng. Agríc. [online]. 27 (2), 363-372. 9. Ghabaei Sough, M., Mosaedi, A. and Hezarjaribi, A., 2010. Evaluation and calibration of different methods to estimate evapotranspiration in three climate samples of Iran. Proceeding of 1st Iranian National Conference on Applied Research in Water Resources, 12-13/May/Spring, Kermanshah, Iran, pp. 239-248 10. Ghamarnia, H. and Soultani, N. 2019. Evaluating the Efficiency of Empirical Estimation of Reference Evapotranspiration (Pan Based Method) in Different Climate Conditions of Iran, Journal of Iran-Water Resources Research, 14(4), 174-193. 11. Jahanbakhsh Asl, S. Movahed danesh, A.A. and Molavi, A., 2002. Analyzing estimation models of evapotranspiration for synoptic station of Tabriz. Journal of Agricultural Science, 11, 51-66. 12. Jensen, D.T., Hargreaves, G.H., Temesgen, B. and Allen, R.G., 1997. Computation of ET0 under noni deal conditions, J. Irrig. and Drain. Engin. ASCE, 123(5), 394-400. 13. Liu, X., Xu, C., Zhong, X., Li, Y., Yuan, X. and Cao, J., 2017. Comparison of 16 models for reference crop evapotranspiration against weighing lysimeter measurement. Agricultural water management, 184, pp.145-155. 14. Mazaheri, M., 2006. Determining crop coefficient and zonning water requirement of potatoes in provinces of Khorasan and Semnan, MS.c Thesis, University of Mashhad Ferdowsi, pp. 40-50. 15. Marting, D.L., Klocke, N.L. and Dehaan, D.L., 1985. Measuring eevaporation using mini-lysimeters, Proceeding of the National Conference on Advances in Evapotranspiration, 231-240. 16. Nolz, R. and Cepuder, P., 2008. Evapotranspiration and percolation of a lysimeter, geophysical research abstracts, Vol. 10, EGU2008-A-08433, 2008SRef-ID: 1607-7962/gra/EGU2008-A-08433EGU General Assembly 2008. 17. Poormohammadi, S., Dastorani, M.T Cheraghi, S.A.M. Mokhtari, M.H. and Rahimian, M.H., 2011. Evaluation and estimation of water Balance components in arid zone catchments using RS and GIS, Case study: Manshad catchment, Yazd province. Journal of Water and Wastewater, 3, 99-108. 18. Raoof, M. and Azizi Mobaser, J, 2018. Evaluation of eighteen reference evapotranspiration models under the Ardabil climate condition, Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, Vol. 24(6),227-241, 10.22069/jwsc.2017.12528.2723 19. Rahimi Khoob, A., Behbahani S.M.R. and Nazarifar, M.H.E., 2012. valuation of Using Minimum Meteorological Data for Penman Montieth Equation- Case Study Khuzestan Province Journal of Agriculture Science, 12(3), 591-600. 20. Seifi A, Mirlatifi S M, Riahi H (2011) Developing a 21. combined model of multiple linear regression- 22. principal component and factor analysis(MLR-PCA) 23. for estimation of reference evapotranspiration (Case study: Kerman station). Journal of Water and Soil, 24(6):1186-1196 24. Shahabifar, M., Assari, M. Kouchakzadeh, M. and Mirlotfi, S.M., 2010. Evaluating some computational methods of evapotranspiration for Grass reference crop using lysimeter data in greenhouse conditions. Journal of Water Research in Agriculture, 24(1), 13-19. 25. Shahabifar, M. and Rahimian, M.J., 2007. Measurement of sugar beet water requirements by lysimeter method in Mashhsd. Journal of sugar beet, 23(2), 174-177. 26. Silva, F.C., Folegatti, M.V. and Pereira, A.R., 1999. Usage of lysimeter devices for evapotranspiration reference determination Revista Barsileira de agrometeorologia. Santa Maria, 1, 19-23. 27. Xu, C.Y. and Chen, D., 2006. Comparison of seven models for estimation of evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge using lysimeter measurement data in Germany. Hydrological Processes, 19, 3717-3734.