Investigating the Relationship between Soil and Plant Organic Carbon, Camphorosma Monspeliaca L., and Some Chemical Parameters in Arid and Semi-Arid Rangelands of Ghahavand Plain

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Nature Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran

2 Nature Engineering Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Malayer University, Malayer

‎10.22052/deej.2024.253756.1029

Abstract

Introduction: Plant and soil conservation play a vital role in effective rangeland management, especially in dealing with the threats caused by climate change. On the other hand, there exists a complex interaction between soil and vegetation in rangeland ecosystems, neither of which is solely dependent on the other. Moreover, various natural factors, including climate change, aridity, desertification, and drought, may accelerate the degradation of rangelands, making the identification of such a relationship a necessity for evaluating the potential for carbon sequestration in arid and semi-arid landscapes. In this regard, as rangeland ecosystems in Qahavand plain, Hamadan, have been influenced by drought and desertification, this study sought to examine the relationship between soil parameters and the key species of the Qahavand rangeland, that is, Camphorosma Monspeliaca L. , concentrating on the storage of organic carbon.
 
Materials and Methods: to collect soil and plant samples from the study area during the mid-growing season, three transects and eleven plots were selected using a systematic randomized sampling method. The positions of the transects were chosen based on the overall slopes of the area, and the plots were selected randomly along each transect using Google Earth software and GPS. Moreover, soil samples were taken from depths of 0-15 and 15-50 cm, which were then transferred to the laboratory for analysis. In this regard, a total of twenty-two soil samples and eleven aerial biomass samples were collected for further chemical analysis so that changes in soil and plant properties can be studied. Finally, various parameters such as soil and plant organic carbon, soil texture, pH, EC, bulk density, total nitrogen, nitrate, and ammonium were measured, followed by the performance of statistical analysis and linear correlation using SAS v.9.4 software.
 
Results and Discussion: Changes in the organic carbon content and their relationship with other parameters were investigated in the areas covered by Camphorosma Monspeliaca L. The results revealed no significant changes in organic carbon, acidity, total nitrogen content, nitrate, and ammonium at depths of 0-15 cm and 15-50 cm (P>0.05). Therefore, it can be argued that the presence of Camphorosma Monspeliaca L. species does not exert a significant influence on those parameters in surface and subsurface soils. On the other hand, notable changes were found in clay percentage and specific bulk density at both soil depths mentioned above. Moreover, Pearson's linear correlation analysis between soil parameters and organic carbon content indicated that except for silt percentage (p>0.05), there was no strong and significant relationship between the two. Generally, changes in soil organic carbon content, acidity, clay percentage, sand percentage, total nitrogen percentage, nitrate, and ammonium were found to have been aligned in the same direction. However, the organic carbon content showed an inverse relationship with other parameters. Therefore, it could be argued that except for silt percentage (r=-0.41, p ≤ 0.05), there was no significant correlation between soil organic carbon and the other parameters.
While variations in soil organic carbon were generally expected to be found within the 0-50 cm depth, no significant changes were reported within the study area in this regard. In other words, the analysis of changes in soil organic carbon and linear correlations did not show any substantial difference in the organic carbon content between the surface and subsurface layers of the soil covered by Camphorosma Monspeliaca L, indicating that no significant alteration has occurred in soil organic carbon storage within the 0-50 cm depth of Qahavand rangelands which is dominantly covered by Camphorosma Mmonspeliaca L. The phenomenon could be attributed to the plant's morphology and root growth patterns, considering the fact that Camphorosma Monspeliaca L. is characterized by a deep robust root system that can extend up to a depth of six meters and cover an area of 60-70 cm, contingent upon the groundwater depth. Furthermore, the absence of noticeable changes in other key properties of both surface and subsurface soil may also be related to such a phenomenon.
Additionally, no significant correlation was found between the organic carbon storage in surface and subsurface layers of the soil and the plant’s organic carbon. It should be noted that interactions among numerous factors play a crucial role in predicting soil carbon reservoirs and that inorganic carbon could potentially constitute a significant reservoir in Qahavand rangeland soils. Accordingly, it is recommended that a broader range of physical and chemical properties of both the soil and Camphorosma Monspeliaca L. be monitored to gain a comprehensive understanding of soil carbon sequestration within the region. Based on the average soil organic carbon content and soil bulk density, estimations suggest that the potential for soil organic carbon sequestration within the 0-50 cm depth of Qahavand rangelands approaches 90.9 tons per hectare.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  1. Ahmadi, H., Hashmati, G., & Naseri, H.R., (2022). Carbon sequestration potential of soil in desert lands under the effect of two species, Tag and Sof (case study: Aran and Bidgol). Desert Ecosystem Engineering, 3(5), 29-36.
  2. Amiri, F., (2017). Investigating the carbon storage potential of the species Halocnemum strobilaceum in coastal pastures in the south of Bushehr province. Pasture and desert research of Iran, 24(1), 193-204.
  3. Badehian, Z., & Mansouri, M., (2017). Determine the amount of carbon sequestration in rangeland species (case study: Atriplex canescens). Human & Environment, 15(4), 1-10.
  4. Bender, S. F., Wagg, C., & van der Heijden, M. G., (2016). An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends in ecology & evolution, 31(6), 440-452.
  5. Bigio, L., Navon, Y., Konsens, I., Lebrija-Trejos, E., Kigel, J., Sternberg, M., & Grünzweig, J. M., (2023). Increasing aridity reduces carbon sequestration in drylands by markedly lowering production but maintaining high rates of decomposition. In EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts(pp. EGU-12941).
  6. Büyük, G., Akça, E., Kume, T., & Nagano, T., (2020). Biomass effect on soil organic carbon in semi-arid continental conditions in central Turkey. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies29(5), 3525-3533.
  7. Conant, R. T., Cerri, C. E., Osborne, B. B., & Paustian, K., (2017). Grassland management impacts on soil carbon stocks: a new synthesis. Ecological Applications27(2), 662-668.
  8. Derakhshan, F., Abdi, N., Torangzar, H., & Ahmadi, A., (2022). Comparing Soil and Phytomass Carbon Sequestration in Two Land Uses: Rangeland and Cropland (Case Study: Mahallat, Galcheshmeh Region, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 12(1), 21-32.
  9. Hassanvand, H., Azimi, M., Nik Nihad Qormakher, H., & Rahbar, G., (2019). Estimation of the ecosystem service of carbon sequestration by dominant species in Tilabad pastures, Golestan province. Pasture, 14(4), 673-684.
  10. Herrick, J. E., & Wander, M. M., (2018). Relationships between soil organic carbon and soil quality in cropped and rangeland soils: the importance of distribution, composition, and soil biological activity. In Soil processes and the carbon cycle, CRC Press, pp.405-425.
  11. Ksiksi, T. S., Trueman, R., Abdelfattah, M., Mousa, M. T., Almarzouqi, A. Y., & Barahim, S. A., (2019). Above and belowground carbon pools are affected by dominant floral species in hyper-arid environments. F1000Research8, 1043.
  12. Khedri Gharibvand, H., Dayanti Tilki, Q., Masadaghi, M., & Sardari, M., (2018). Some ecological features of Camphorosma monspeliaca species in Doto-Tang Sayad habitat of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari province. Pasture and desert research of Iran, 17(4), 632-645.
  13. Kohestani, N., Rostgar, Sh., Heydari, Q., Shatabi Joibari, Sh., & Amirnejad, H., (2021). Monitoring the spatial distribution of soil carbon sequestration during four decades of changes in the condition of pasture lands (case study: Noorroud watershed) Mazandaran province). pasture, 15(2), 344-356.
  14. Lorenz, K., & Lal, R., (2018). Carbon sequestration in grassland soils. In Carbon sequestration in agricultural ecosystems. Springer, Cham, pp. 175-209.
  15. McKenna, M. D., Grams, S. E., Barasha, M., Antoninka, A. J., & Johnson, N. C., (2022). Organic and inorganic soil carbon in a semi-arid rangeland is primarily related to abiotic factors and not livestock grazing. Geoderma. 419, 115844.
  16. Mirzaei, J., Seidi, F., Sobhan Ardakani, S., & Bazgir, M., (2014). Effects of native and exotic tree plantation on carbon sequestration at arid areas of Zagros region (Case study: Abgarm forest park, Dehloran). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research21(3), 506-516.
  17. Mofidi Chelan, M., Shidai Kirkej, A., & Qureshi, R., (2021). Estimation of the economic value of carbon sequestration in a part of Incheh Barun salt marshes, Golestan province. Marte, 15(2), 269-281.
  18. Moghimi, J., (2005). Introduction of some important pasture species suitable for the development and improvement of Iran's pastures - Aron Publications. 669 p.
  19. Muvengwi, J., Ndagurwa, H. G., & Nyenda, T., 2015. Enhanced soil nutrient concentrations beneath-canopy of savanna trees infected by mistletoes in a southern African savanna. Journal of Arid Environments, 116, 25-28.
  20. Parvizi, Y., Qeytouri, M., Bayat, R., Shadmani, A., & Partovi, A., 2018. Carbon sequestration potential of different range planting practices in different geographical areas of the country. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 25(2), 310-323.
  21. Pulido-Fernández, M., Schnabel, S., Lavado-Contador, J. F., Mellado, I. M., & Pérez, R. O., (2013). Soil organic matter of Iberian open woodland rangelands as influenced by vegetation cover and land management. Catena, 109, 13-24.
  22. Ranjbari Karimian, J., Azarnivand, H., Tavali, A., Jafari, M., & Zare Chahoki, M., (2022). Comparison of soil carbon storage in two plant types Stipa barbata and Salsola rigida in Akhtarabad Shahryar region. Desert ecosystem engineering, 2(3), 11-18.
  23. Ribbons, R. R., Levy-Booth, D. J., Masse, J., Grayston, S. J., McDonald, M. A., Vesterdal, L., & Prescott, C. E., 2016. Linking microbial communities, functional genes and nitrogen-cycling processes in forest floors under four tree species. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 103, 181-191.
  24. Rice, C., (2000). Soil Organic C and N in Rangeland Soils under Elevation CO2 and Land management. Advances in Terrestrial Ecosystem Carbon Inventory, Measurements and Monitoring Conference in Raleigh, North Carolina, 3-5, October, 15-24. Agriculture Resources, 59, 491-505.
  25. Rumpel, C., & Chabbi, A., (2019). Plant–Soil Interactions Control CNP Coupling and Decoupling Processes in Agroecosystems with Perennial Vegetation. In Agroecosystem Diversity. Academic Press, pp.3-13.
  26. Tavakoli, H., (2016). Potential of carbon sequestration of Hammada salicornica vegetation type in desert areas (Case study: South Khorasan, Iran). Journal of Rangeland Science, 6(1), 24-32.
  27. Tessema, B., Sommer, R., Piikki, K., Söderström, M., Namirembe, S., Notenbaert, A., & Paul, B., (2020). Potential for soil organic carbon sequestration in grasslands in East African countries: A review. Grassland Science, 66(3), 135-144.
  28. Varamesh, S., Hosseini, S. M., Abdi, N., & Akbarinia, M. O. S. L. E. M., (2010). Increment of soil carbon sequestration due to forestation and its relation with some physical and chemical factors of soil. Iranian Journal of Forest, 2(1), 25-35.
  29. Walkley, A., & Black, A., 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci, 37, 29-38.
  30. Wiesmeier, M., Urbanski, L., Hobley, E., Lang, B., von Lützow, M., Marin-Spiotta, E., & Kögel-Knabner, I., 2019. Soil organic carbon storage as a key function of soils-A review of drivers and indicators at various scales. Geoderma, 333, 149-162.
  31. Yajuan, W., Meiying, L., Ji, W., Xiaohong, D., & Yanlong, H., 2022. The effects of vegetation communities on soil organic carbon stock in an enclosed desert-steppe region of northern China. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition68(2), 284-294.