Edaphically investigation of the Somaq habitat and its relationship with biological diversity (Case study: Bideskan habitat, Ferdows, Southeastern Khorasan, Iran)

Authors

10.22052/deej.2018.7.19.11

Abstract

Introduction: The natural ecosystems of Iran are the most important origins of speciation in the world and protecting this diversity is of great importance. Sumac species in Bideskan habitat is considered as one of the most important rangeland sub-products that in addition to regional economic prosperity, it provides sustainable employment for villagers and is considered as an important species for soil conservation. Therefore, by studying the environmental conditions and the needs of the Sumac species, it would be possible to judge about its geographic distribution, density and activity in different environments.
 
Material and methods: The habitat of Bideskan with an area of 3685 hectares is considered as one of the sub basins of the Lut Desert great basin in Iran. During May 2016, through the field visit, vegetation information and environmental factors were monitored. The area was divided into two parts of the natural Sumac beds and the control area, however with the same geological formation. In each section, 15 plots (total of 30 plots and soil samples) were taken by a random-systematic approach. A size of 10 × 10 m for the sampled plot was considered according to the type of plants and their distribution in the area. Within each plot, information related to the plants, including number and type, were recorded. During sampling, it was determined that the rootage direction of the Rhus coriaria L. followed the longitudinal growth in the soil and moved in the direction of the gradient, as a result, soil samples were taken from a depth of 0-30 cm. In the next step, taken soil samples were dried and in order to prepare for soil tests, they were passed through a 2 mm sieve. Subsequently, the parameters soil texture, saturation moisture content, pH, EC, OM, lime, Na, K, Ca, Mg, cation exchange capacity (CEC), and total nitrogen (N) were determined in laboratory. To determine the diversity and species richness, the number of species was counted in each plot within the two habitats of Sumac and control. Shannon-Weiner Species Diversity Index, Simpson and Fisher Alpha were calculated based on the frequency of plant species using the EstimateS win 9.1. The independent t-test was used in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software to compare the measured variables in two areas of Sumac habitat and control.
 
Results and discussion: In total 24 species belong to 14 families were identified in area. The most dominted familiy was Asteraceae having 8 species of total number of species, followed by Apiaceae, Geraniaceae, Poaceae with 2 species each. Hemicryptophytes were the most important biological form with 14 species (54.16%), the Trophites with 7 species (33.33%), Geophytes with 2 species (8.33%) and Phanerophytes with 1 species (4.16%) were measured. Asteraceae species had a better adaptation to climatic conditions than other families. This could be due to a better compatibility of this family with climatic harsh conditions, which gives them a high potential of distribution. The presence of 58.33% Hemicryptophyte can be attributed to the dry-cold climate and mountainous topographic conditions. Furthermore, the abundance of Therophyte (33%) revealed low rainfall, recent droughts, unfavorable conditions of the enclosure and grazing and, consequently, the degradation caused by the impact of the pressures from these factors, are among the reasons that affect annual plants.According to the Shannon-Weiner index, the Sumac habitat with the index of 1.942 is more diverse than the control area (with an index of 1.667). The higher the evenness index, the distribution of species within the plot or a range is more uniform; therefore, the Sumac habitat with uniformity equal to 0.717 has more uniform distribution compared to the control area. According to the Shannon-Weiner and Simpson diversity indices, the Sumac habitat is more diverse, although its number of species (15 species) is less than the number of species in the control area (17 species). The student's t-test of independent samples on soil data showed that the soil fctors EC, ECe, Ca, OM, TNV, pH, K and silt content had significant differences in two regions. Moreover, four factors of EC, K, OM and TNV in the Sumac habitat showed a significant increase compared to the control area. The falling of shoot organs on the soil surface could be the main reason for the increase of K and OM under the stratum of the Sumac plant. The increase in the content of litters causes the increase of soil porosity, the decrease of bulk density and thus the soil gets better permeability conditions. The results confirm the significant role of Rhus coriaria in soil conservation planning. Therefore, it is necessary to encourage local farmers to preserve this species.
Conclusion: Awareness of the relationship between soil characteristics and the distribution of plant species is vital for the sustainable use of rangelands. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the effect of soil characteristics in the distribution of vegetation cover, especially Rhus coriaria L. in Bideskan habitat. The sampling results indicated that the most important vegetative form of the region, is Hemicryptophytes, 58.35% of the species population of the area, followed by Throphytes with 33% . The student's t-test of independent samples on soil data showed that the soil properties EC, ECe, Ca, OM, TNV, pH, K and silt content had significant differences in two regions. Moreover, four factors of EC, K, OM and TNV in the Sumac habitat showed a significant increase compared to the control area. According to the results of this research, it can be stated that it is possible to establish Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) as a species compatible with arid areas (calcareous soils with higher EC) to control erosion and sedimentation and improve revival of green spaces in mountainous regions of arid and semi arid areas, especially in Khorasan province and others areas with similar ecological conditions.
 

Keywords

References

1. Abd El-Ghani, Wafaa M., 2003. Soil-vegetation relationships in a coastal desert plain of southern Sinai, Egypt. Journal of Arid Environment, 55: 607-628. 2. Archibold,O.W., 1995. Ecology of world vegetation, Champman and Hall Inc,London.509p. 3. Ardakani, M., 2006. Ecology (Edition 6), Tehran University Press. 4. Azarnivand, H., Jafari, M., Moghaddam, M.R., Jalili, A., and Zare Cahouki, M.A., 2003. The effect of soil characteristics and elevation on distribution of two Artemisia species. (Case study: Vardavad, Garmsa and Semnan Rangelands). Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 56(1, 2): 93-100. 5. Blesky, A.J., Canham, C.D., 1994. Forest gaps and isolated savanna trees. An application of patch dynamics in two ecosystems. Bioscience 44: 77 84. 6. Burely, J., 2002. Forest biological diversity: An overview. Unasylva journal. 53: 3-9. 7. Chahuki, Z., Hosseini, M.A., Toville, M., 2001. Investigation of Factors Affecting Species Diversity Changes in Middle Taleghan Rangelands (Case Study: Rangelands around Weststed Village). Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology). Vol. 28. No. 2. 8. Colwell, R.K., 2013. EstimateS: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Retrieved through http:viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu.estimates. 9. Cui, B.S., Zhai, H.J., Dong, S.K., Chen, B., and Liu, S L., 2009. Multivariate analysis of the effects of edaphic and topographical factors on plant distribution in the Yilong lake basin of Yun-Gui Plateau. China. Canadian, Journal of Plant Science. 89: 209-219. 10. Davis, P.H., 1965-1988. Flora of Turkey, Vols 1-0, University of Edinburgh press. 11. Dirnbock, T., 2002. Vegetation distribution in relation to topographically driven processes in southwestern Australia. Applied Vegetation Science. 5:147-158. 12. Droodi, H., Moslem Akbariya, S.Gh., Jardi, A., 2010. The effect of some physiographic factors on habitat growth characteristics on the southern slopes of Binaloud Mountains (Neyshabur). Iran Biology Magazine. 23 (2): 298-287. 13. Emad, Mehdi., Ghibi, Fariborz., Rasouli, Seyyed Mohsen., Khanjanzadeh, Rasool., Mohammadi Jozani, Saeed., 2012. Collection of medicinal plant of Rhus coriaria. Peyman Nawandish Publications. 40 pages. 14. Enright, N.J., Miller, B.P., Akhtar. R., 2005. Desert vegetation and vegetation-environment relationships in Kirthar National Park, Sindh, Pakistan, Arid Environments, 61: 397-418. 15. Gee, G.W., Bauder, J.W., and Klute, A., 1986. Particle-size analysis. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods, 383-411. 16. Ghaherman nezad, F., Aqli, S., 2009. Fluorist study of National Park of Kaiser. Taxonomy and Biosystematic Journal, First Year, No. 1, Winter 2009, 62-47p. 17. Green, S.B., Salkind, N. J., 2010. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall Press. 18. Hajizadeh, A., 1990. Soil Science. Islamic Azad University Scientific Center. P. 210. 19. Hardtle, W., Goddert, O., and Christina, W., 2003. The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein). Forest Ecology and Management, 182: 327-338. 20. Havlin, J.L., Beaton, J.D., Tisdale, S.L., Nelson, W. L., 2005. Soil fertility and fertilizers: An introduction to nutrient management (Vol. 515, pp. 97-141). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall. 21. Hoseinpor, M., Moodi, R., Ghollasimod, S., Memariyan, H., 2014. Study on relationship between species diversity and environmental factors in in arid and semi-arid pastures (Foorg Rangelands). 2nd Nationl conference on Desert. Semnan Unversity of semnan. 22. Jafari, M., Tavili, A., Rostampour, M., Zare Chahuki, M.A., And Farzad Mehr, J., 2009. Investigation of environmental factors affecting the distribution of vegetation cover of sub-mountain ranges in Qa'in province, Pasture and Watershed Journal, 2: 197-213. 23. Jarema, S.I., Samson, J., McGill, B.J., and Humphries, M.M., 2009. Variation in abundance across a species range predicts climate change responses in the range interior will exceed those at the edge. acase study with north American beaver. Global Change Biology, 15: 50-52. 24. Jenkins, M.A., Parker.1998.Composition and diversity of woody vegetation in silvicultural openings of southern Indiana forests, Forest Ecology and Management, 109: 57-74. 25. Jin-Tun, Z., 2002. A study on relation of vegetation. climate and soil in Shanxi province. Plant Ecology No: 162. P: 23-31. 26. Jongman, R., Ter Break, C., Van Tongeren, O., 1987. Data Analysis in community and landscape ecology. Center Fire Agricultural Publishing and Documentation. wageningen. 27. Krzic, M., Newman, R.F., Broersma, K., 2003. Plant specises diversity and soil quality in harvested and grazed boreal aspen stands of northeastern British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management, 182: 315-325. 28. Layon, J., Sagers, C., 2002. Correspondence analysis offunctional groupsin a riparian landscape, Plant Ecology No:164,p:171-183. 29. Leonard, J., 1998. Relationships between vegetation cover and soil in arid and semi arid area. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands. USA. 30. Medinski, T.V., Mills, A.J., Esler, K.J., Schmiedel, U., & Jürgens, N., 2010. Do soil properties constrain species richness? Insights from boundary line analysis across several biomes in south western Africa, Journal of Arid Environments, 74: 1052- 1060. 31. Mesdaghi, M., 2001. Analysis and Describe of Vegetation, Jahad University of Mashhad Press Mashhad, Iran 288pp. 32. Mesdaghi, M., 2011. Description and analysis of vegetation cover. Jihad Daneshgahi, Mashhad. P.283 (in Persian(. 33. Mirzaii, J., Rebirth, M., and Universal, H., 2006. Effect of Crushed Shrub Trees on Soil Factors and Biodiversity of Grass Species Under the Fence (Case Study: Manht and Qalarang Protected Area, Ilam). Second Conference on Environmental Planning and Management. 34. Mozaffarian, Valid Allah., 2004. Iran's Trees and Mines. Farhang Contemporary Publishing. 1003 p. 35. Rezaei Pourbaghdar, Abdolhossein., Sadeghinia, Majid., Noahahar, Ahmad., Hakimi, Mohammad Hussein., 2014. Determination of the relationship between the distribution of Dorema ammoniacum and Rheum ribes with some soil parameters (Case study: Baghdar rangelands Bafgh) Journal of Ecosystem Engineering Desert, 3(4): 69-78. 36. Rezaeipoor, M., Jahani, H., Hosseini, S.M., Mirzaei, J., Jafari, A., 2013. Ecological study of Samaq shrubs in western Iran, Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology). Vol. 26, No. 4. pp. 444-452. 37. Roosta , M., 2015. Investigating the Effect of Two Rhus Coriaria Rangelands and Amygdalus Scoparia on Some Soil Chemical Properties (Case Study: Kakhk in Gonabad). Master thesis. Faculty of Natural Resources, Birjand University. 38. Sabeti, Habibollah., 2002. Iran's forests, mussels and mussels. Yazd University Press. P. 911. 39. Seaby, R.M., & Henderson, P.A., 2006. Species diversity and richness version 4. Pisces Conservation Ltd., Lymington, England, 123. 40. Sharify Nayaragh, J., 1997. Relationships between species diversity and vegetation forms in Ardebil natural grasslands, Pajouhesh and Sazandegi, 26: 31:33. 41. Tabaki Bajestani, K., Khajedin, S.J., Mokhtari, A.R., Jafri, R. 2014. Identification of Geothermal resource according to GIS dt, Case study, Southern Khorasan, Ferdos. Remote Sensing and Iran GIS, 6(2): 31-49. 42. Tolera, M., Asfawa, Z., Lemenih, M., & Karltun, E., 2008. Woody species diversity in a changing landscape in the south-central highlands of Ethiopia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 128: 52-58. Yibing, Q., 2008. Impact of habitat heterogeneity on plant community pattern in Gurbantunggt Desert, Geological Science, 14(4): 447-455. 43. Yousefi, M., 2006, Fertilizer Bidscan Plan. Department of Natural Resources of Khorasan Razavi. 44. Zare Chahuki, M.A., 2001. Investigating the Relationship Between Some Rangeland Species and Some Physical and Chemical Characteristics of Soils in Poshtkouh Rangelands of Yazd Province. Master thesis of rangeland of Tehran University. 45. Zhao, C., Chen, W., Tin, Z., Xie, Z., 2005. Altitudinal Pattern of Plant Species Diversity in Shennongjia Mountains, Central China. Journal of Integrative Plant BiologyFormerly Acta Botanica Sinica, 47 (12): 1431-1449.
Desert Ecosystem Engineering
Volume 7, Issue 19
August 2018
Pages 17-32

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics