<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه کاشان</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>مهندسی اکوسیستم بیابان</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2538-6336</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>42</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>09</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Investigating the Influence of Pioneer Plants’ Stemflow on Soil and Concomitant Plants in Arid Zones</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>Investigating the Influence of Pioneer Plants’ Stemflow on Soil and Concomitant Plants in Arid Zones</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>79</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>92</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">114547</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22052/jdee.2024.253639.1094</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سعید</FirstName>
					<LastName>یوسفی</LastName>
<Affiliation>MSc of Range Science, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>سید حمید</FirstName>
					<LastName>متین خواه</LastName>
<Affiliation>Associate Professor of Forestry, Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>زهرا</FirstName>
					<LastName>جعفری</LastName>
<Affiliation>Ph.D. of Range Science, Department of Natural Resources, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2024</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>28</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This study set out to investigate the influence of stemflow of &lt;em&gt;Anabasis aphylla&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;L&lt;strong&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;and&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pteropyrum aucheri&lt;/em&gt; Jaub. &amp; Spach on soil and concomitant plants in Central Iran. To this end, the stemflow was measured on ten mature plants with five replicates per species from March 21, 2014, to May 2, 2014. Moreover, the volume of collected flows was measured after each rainfall using measuring cylinders. Then, the volume was divided by the crown area to find the flow depth for each stem. On the other hand, to investigate the influence of stemflow on nursing understory plants, the plants were treated with and without stemflow at different depths. In this regard, the &lt;em&gt;Lepidium sativum&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Linn&lt;/em&gt; was selected as the intended species to investigate the stemflow nursing effect of &lt;em&gt;A. aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P. aucheri&lt;/em&gt;.  The results of the study indicated that the average rate of stemflow in &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; ​​was 18.5% and 13.4% of gross rainfall, respectively. Furthermore, the average funneling ratio ​​was&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;found to be 29 and 39.9 for &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt;, respectively. The moisture, OM, and MWD obtained for the soil under &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; were significantly different when treated with stemflow in depths of 80 and 100 cm from the case when the underlying soil of the species was treated without streamflow. However, while the variations in soil’s pH were not significant at different depths in both treatments and bare soil, the variations showed a slight increase in &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; compared to &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; and bare soil. On the other hand, the investigation of the two treatments in terms of EC values ​​revealed that salinity was higher in the treatment without stemflow. It was also found that the efficiency of stemflow nursing was up to 10 cm and 7 cm&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;in&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;radius in &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri &lt;/em&gt;and&lt;em&gt; A.aphyll, &lt;/em&gt;respectively.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This study set out to investigate the influence of stemflow of &lt;em&gt;Anabasis aphylla&lt;/em&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;L&lt;strong&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;and&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pteropyrum aucheri&lt;/em&gt; Jaub. &amp; Spach on soil and concomitant plants in Central Iran. To this end, the stemflow was measured on ten mature plants with five replicates per species from March 21, 2014, to May 2, 2014. Moreover, the volume of collected flows was measured after each rainfall using measuring cylinders. Then, the volume was divided by the crown area to find the flow depth for each stem. On the other hand, to investigate the influence of stemflow on nursing understory plants, the plants were treated with and without stemflow at different depths. In this regard, the &lt;em&gt;Lepidium sativum&lt;/em&gt; &lt;em&gt;Linn&lt;/em&gt; was selected as the intended species to investigate the stemflow nursing effect of &lt;em&gt;A. aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P. aucheri&lt;/em&gt;.  The results of the study indicated that the average rate of stemflow in &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; ​​was 18.5% and 13.4% of gross rainfall, respectively. Furthermore, the average funneling ratio ​​was&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;found to be 29 and 39.9 for &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt;, respectively. The moisture, OM, and MWD obtained for the soil under &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; were significantly different when treated with stemflow in depths of 80 and 100 cm from the case when the underlying soil of the species was treated without streamflow. However, while the variations in soil’s pH were not significant at different depths in both treatments and bare soil, the variations showed a slight increase in &lt;em&gt;A.aphylla&lt;/em&gt; compared to &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri&lt;/em&gt; and bare soil. On the other hand, the investigation of the two treatments in terms of EC values ​​revealed that salinity was higher in the treatment without stemflow. It was also found that the efficiency of stemflow nursing was up to 10 cm and 7 cm&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;in&lt;em&gt; &lt;/em&gt;radius in &lt;em&gt;P.aucheri &lt;/em&gt;and&lt;em&gt; A.aphyll, &lt;/em&gt;respectively.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Stemflow</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pioneer Plants</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Anabasis aphylla</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Pterpyrum aucheri</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Arid Land</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://deej.kashanu.ac.ir/article_114547_b701a9202373af5b883ab1a3abcd7c43.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
